Comparative Analysis Of Solar Fed DC-DC Converter Controlled With Different Types Of MPPT Algorithm

Farhat Khan, A. Tariq
{"title":"Comparative Analysis Of Solar Fed DC-DC Converter Controlled With Different Types Of MPPT Algorithm","authors":"Farhat Khan, A. Tariq","doi":"10.1109/PIECON56912.2023.10085886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines and compares five distinct configurations of non-isolated DC-DC converters (BOOST, BUCKBOOST, CUK, SEPIC, and ZETA) that are controlled by two different Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms. i.e., INCREMENTAL CONDUCTANCE (INC) and FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER (FLC) under constant (i.e., $1000\\mathrm{~W}/\\mathrm{m}^{2}$) and variation in irradiation (i.e., $1000\\mathrm{~W}/\\mathrm{m}^{2},800\\mathrm{~W}/\\mathrm{m}^{2},500\\mathrm{~W}/\\mathrm{m}^{2}$) at constant temperature condition of 25°C and comparison is made in terms of efficiency under these irradiation condition. The properties of these converters are analyzed to determine which configuration is best appropriate for the Photovoltaic (PV) system being employed controlled with INC and FLC based techniques. The comparison of 2 MPPT techniques is done on same topology of converters and same specification of the PV module for proper analyze of design. The system designing and modelling of passive components for 220V at the output from input of 145V of PV panel is carried out. The design performance and results of system is carried on the MATLAB/SIMULINK environment.","PeriodicalId":182428,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Power, Instrumentation, Energy and Control (PIECON)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Power, Instrumentation, Energy and Control (PIECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIECON56912.2023.10085886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines and compares five distinct configurations of non-isolated DC-DC converters (BOOST, BUCKBOOST, CUK, SEPIC, and ZETA) that are controlled by two different Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms. i.e., INCREMENTAL CONDUCTANCE (INC) and FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER (FLC) under constant (i.e., $1000\mathrm{~W}/\mathrm{m}^{2}$) and variation in irradiation (i.e., $1000\mathrm{~W}/\mathrm{m}^{2},800\mathrm{~W}/\mathrm{m}^{2},500\mathrm{~W}/\mathrm{m}^{2}$) at constant temperature condition of 25°C and comparison is made in terms of efficiency under these irradiation condition. The properties of these converters are analyzed to determine which configuration is best appropriate for the Photovoltaic (PV) system being employed controlled with INC and FLC based techniques. The comparison of 2 MPPT techniques is done on same topology of converters and same specification of the PV module for proper analyze of design. The system designing and modelling of passive components for 220V at the output from input of 145V of PV panel is carried out. The design performance and results of system is carried on the MATLAB/SIMULINK environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同MPPT算法控制太阳能馈电DC-DC变换器的比较分析
本文研究并比较了五种不同的非隔离DC-DC转换器配置(BOOST、BUCKBOOST、CUK、SEPIC和ZETA),它们由两种不同的最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法控制。在恒定(即$1000\ mathm {~W}/\ mathm {m}^{2}$)和辐照变化(即$1000\ mathm {~W}/\ mathm {m}^{2}},800\ mathm {~W}/\ mathm {m}^{2}},500\ mathm {~W}/\ mathm {m}^{2}$)条件下的增量电导(INC)和模糊逻辑控制器(FLC),并对这些辐照条件下的效率进行了比较。分析了这些变流器的特性,以确定哪种配置最适合采用基于INC和FLC的技术控制的光伏系统。在相同的变流器拓扑结构和相同的光伏组件规格下,对两种MPPT技术进行了比较,以便进行合理的设计分析。对光伏板145V输入输出220V无源元件进行了系统设计和建模。系统的设计性能和结果在MATLAB/SIMULINK环境下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of Market Based Economic Dispatch in India for uniform electricity pricing Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Time Varying Disturbances: Comparative Study on a DC-DC Boost Converter Design of Missile Roll Autopilot based on Quantitative Feedback Theory Autonomous Underwater Vehicles’ Control System Design Implementation Three-Phase Dynamic AC Braking of Induction Motors by Discontinuous Phase-Controlled Switching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1