Participatory video for nutrition training for farmers in Malawi: an analysis of knowledge gain and adoption

Tian Cai, Hastings Chiwasa, C. Steinfield, Susan Wyche
{"title":"Participatory video for nutrition training for farmers in Malawi: an analysis of knowledge gain and adoption","authors":"Tian Cai, Hastings Chiwasa, C. Steinfield, Susan Wyche","doi":"10.1145/2737856.2737878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how participatory video can improve the knowledge and adoption of nutrition and food preparation practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Using a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design, this study found that the participatory video method improved the participants' knowledge as much as the traditional demonstration method. Short-term adoption tests were carried out 7--10 days after the training. The extent of short-term adoption of the technique varied by the training topic. For egg-coated nsima, the overall short-term adoption rate was a little over 60% across the groups, while the rate for egg-coated pumpkin flower was around 32%. This rate for the former practice was significantly lower in the video group (50.9%) than in the traditional demonstration group (75.6%) mainly because the participants were unable to taste and smell the food during the video training. The adoption rate for the latter practice was similar between the two groups.","PeriodicalId":210700,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2737878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper explores how participatory video can improve the knowledge and adoption of nutrition and food preparation practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Using a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design, this study found that the participatory video method improved the participants' knowledge as much as the traditional demonstration method. Short-term adoption tests were carried out 7--10 days after the training. The extent of short-term adoption of the technique varied by the training topic. For egg-coated nsima, the overall short-term adoption rate was a little over 60% across the groups, while the rate for egg-coated pumpkin flower was around 32%. This rate for the former practice was significantly lower in the video group (50.9%) than in the traditional demonstration group (75.6%) mainly because the participants were unable to taste and smell the food during the video training. The adoption rate for the latter practice was similar between the two groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马拉维农民营养培训参与式视频:对知识获取和采用的分析
本文探讨了参与式视频如何能够提高马拉维小农对营养和食品制备实践的认识和采用。采用前测后测的准实验设计,本研究发现参与式视频方法与传统演示方法对被试知识的提高程度相同。培训后7- 10天进行了短期采用测试。短期采用该技术的程度因培训题目而异。对于涂有鸡蛋的南瓜,各组的短期采用率略高于60%,而涂有鸡蛋的南瓜花的采用率约为32%。视频组的这一比例(50.9%)明显低于传统演示组(75.6%),这主要是因为参与者在视频训练期间无法品尝和闻到食物。后一种做法的采用率在两组之间是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile value added services: the case of women microentrepreneurs in Indonesia Graspeo: a social media platform for knowledge management in NGOs ICT's impact on youth and local communities in Syria Promoting participatory community building in refugee camps with mapping technology Good intentions to read on mobiles are not good enough: reducing barriers to m-reading is crucial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1