Yau̯nā and Sakā: Identity Constructions at the Margins of the Achaemenid Empire

Silvia Balatti
{"title":"Yau̯nā and Sakā: Identity Constructions at the Margins of the Achaemenid Empire","authors":"Silvia Balatti","doi":"10.23993/store.89975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Achaemenid Empire can be reasonably considered an “empire of peoples” from both an ideological and structural perspective. It included all the lands of the peoples of the world and all people helped to maintain imperial order and prosperity. In reality, the empire had boundaries and there were peoples who lived near and beyond them. Under King Darius I, groups of people were annexed at the northeastern and northwestern margins of the imperial territory, thus entering the imperial space and consequently also the Achaemenid documents. The border peoples of the Yau̯nā and Sakā were the only peoples of the empire to be differentiated through epithets, which were added to their collective names in the texts. This shows a unique process of group identity constructions by the authorities on the edges of the imperial space. The analysis of the system of epithets used to indicate the Yau̯nā and Sakā conducted in this paper allows us to draw some conclusions on the mechanisms and reasons behind these specific forms of identity constructions at the margins. Moreover, it shows how this process reflected the main directions of imperial expansion under the first Achaemenids.","PeriodicalId":178307,"journal":{"name":"Studia Orientalia Electronica","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Orientalia Electronica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23993/store.89975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Achaemenid Empire can be reasonably considered an “empire of peoples” from both an ideological and structural perspective. It included all the lands of the peoples of the world and all people helped to maintain imperial order and prosperity. In reality, the empire had boundaries and there were peoples who lived near and beyond them. Under King Darius I, groups of people were annexed at the northeastern and northwestern margins of the imperial territory, thus entering the imperial space and consequently also the Achaemenid documents. The border peoples of the Yau̯nā and Sakā were the only peoples of the empire to be differentiated through epithets, which were added to their collective names in the texts. This shows a unique process of group identity constructions by the authorities on the edges of the imperial space. The analysis of the system of epithets used to indicate the Yau̯nā and Sakā conducted in this paper allows us to draw some conclusions on the mechanisms and reasons behind these specific forms of identity constructions at the margins. Moreover, it shows how this process reflected the main directions of imperial expansion under the first Achaemenids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丘尼语和萨克语:阿契美尼德帝国边缘的身份建构
从意识形态和结构的角度来看,阿契美尼德帝国可以被合理地认为是一个“民族帝国”。它包括世界各国人民的所有土地,所有人都帮助维持帝国的秩序和繁荣。实际上,帝国是有边界的,边界附近和边界之外都有民族居住。在大流士一世的统治下,帝国领土的东北部和西北部边缘被吞并,因此进入了帝国的空间,因此也进入了阿契美尼德文件。丘尼纳和萨迦的边境民族是帝国中唯一通过绰号来区分的民族,这些绰号被添加到文本中的集体名称中。这显示了在帝国空间边缘,当局建构群体身份的独特过程。本文通过对“丘尼纳”和“萨克”所使用的称谓系统的分析,可以对这些特定形式的边缘身份建构背后的机制和原因得出一些结论。此外,它还显示了这一过程如何反映了阿契美尼德一世统治下帝国扩张的主要方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fish Symbolism in Indus Valley Epigraphy and Protohistoric Accounts Kālaviphalāny astrāṇi te santu: Story-time in Karṇa’s defeat as depicted in the Mahābhārata Sources at the end of the cuneiform era Construction of Identities and Late Mesopotamian Archives as Found in the Fragments of the ‘Graeco-Babyloniaca’ Constructing Identities: Greek names as a marker of Hellenizing identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1