Minding the gap

Camilla Löf, Ann-Christine Vallberg Roth
{"title":"Minding the gap","authors":"Camilla Löf, Ann-Christine Vallberg Roth","doi":"10.57126/noad.v7i1.6595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the term “teaching” was apostrophized in the revised curriculum for Swedish preschool, preschool teachers seem to have been struggling with the concept in their day-to-day practices. The current article is based in a collaborative R&D programme aiming at further developing knowledge about what may characterize teaching in preschools. In this article a didactic and pragmatically informed teaching approach with focus on values is analysed. The aim is to understand preschool teachers’ interpretations of the didactic why question, which plays a central role in teaching from a pragmatic perspective. The material underlying the teaching approach consists of a total of 364 documents, including 64 video recordings. This was carried about in about 120 preschools and/or preschool departments in ten Swedish municipalities. The analysis takes a didactic approach and can be methodologically described as abductive analysis. The results indicate that the question “why?” in didactic and pragmatically informed teaching with focus on values is characterized by ethical dilemmas concerning rules and norms in preschool practice. Consequently, the ethical dilemmas are constituted as didactic dilemmas, in which preschool teachers, in co-actions with children, focus on values in teaching situations, and for which preschool teachers need to take actions without offending colleagues, children or parents.","PeriodicalId":211767,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57126/noad.v7i1.6595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the term “teaching” was apostrophized in the revised curriculum for Swedish preschool, preschool teachers seem to have been struggling with the concept in their day-to-day practices. The current article is based in a collaborative R&D programme aiming at further developing knowledge about what may characterize teaching in preschools. In this article a didactic and pragmatically informed teaching approach with focus on values is analysed. The aim is to understand preschool teachers’ interpretations of the didactic why question, which plays a central role in teaching from a pragmatic perspective. The material underlying the teaching approach consists of a total of 364 documents, including 64 video recordings. This was carried about in about 120 preschools and/or preschool departments in ten Swedish municipalities. The analysis takes a didactic approach and can be methodologically described as abductive analysis. The results indicate that the question “why?” in didactic and pragmatically informed teaching with focus on values is characterized by ethical dilemmas concerning rules and norms in preschool practice. Consequently, the ethical dilemmas are constituted as didactic dilemmas, in which preschool teachers, in co-actions with children, focus on values in teaching situations, and for which preschool teachers need to take actions without offending colleagues, children or parents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
留意缺口
自从“教学”一词在瑞典学前班修订后的课程中被省略以来,学前班教师似乎在日常实践中一直在与这个概念作斗争。目前的文章是基于一个合作研发计划,旨在进一步发展关于什么可能是幼儿园教学的特征的知识。本文分析了一种以价值观为中心的说教式、语用性的教学方法。目的是从语用学的角度理解幼儿教师对教学中起核心作用的“为什么”问题的解释。教学方法的基础材料包括总共364份文件,包括64份录像。这项工作在瑞典10个城市的大约120所幼儿园和(或)学前教育部门进行。这种分析采用了一种说教的方法,在方法上可以被描述为溯因分析。结果表明,“为什么?”在注重价值观的说教和实用主义教学中,学前教育实践中的规则和规范存在伦理困境。因此,伦理困境构成了教学困境,幼儿教师在与幼儿的合作中关注教学情境中的价值观,幼儿教师需要在不冒犯同事、儿童或家长的情况下采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reformimplementering i förskolepraktik God udeskoleundervisning Alexander von Oettingen: Allmän didaktik – mellan normativitet och evidens. Lund: Studentlitteratur Att bilda eller bedöma? Mänskliga rättigheter som innehåll i undervisningen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1