German Critical Philosophy and Marx

C. Robinson
{"title":"German Critical Philosophy and Marx","authors":"C. Robinson","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649917.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, Robinson explores the German intellectuals who form the basis of Marxism. He links the history of German pietism and the Church with the development of Kantian materialism, which advocated for a radical reformulation of the German social order. Robinson then demonstrates how Kantian German idealism set in motion in German thought a series of determinations essential for Marx’s philosophy. While Marx is applauded for positing a revolutionary theory from the less radical ideas of Hegel, Robinson instead suggests that Hegel in fact contributed far more directly to Marxism than Marx admitted. Indeed, Robinson demonstrates how Hegel’s conception of a universal class (to be Marx’s proletariat), secularization of history (making history happen), and privileging of Western civilization as the only society based on Reason (the secularization of social change) all made their way into Marxism, notwithstanding Marx’s dismissal of Hegel as a mystical idealist. Robinson historicizes Marxism by demonstrating how Kant’s formulation of the German bureaucracy as a class, followed by Hegel’s argument that this class’s consciousness came from its political work, were appropriated by Marx and Engels for their later work.","PeriodicalId":429391,"journal":{"name":"An Anthropology of Marxism","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Anthropology of Marxism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649917.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, Robinson explores the German intellectuals who form the basis of Marxism. He links the history of German pietism and the Church with the development of Kantian materialism, which advocated for a radical reformulation of the German social order. Robinson then demonstrates how Kantian German idealism set in motion in German thought a series of determinations essential for Marx’s philosophy. While Marx is applauded for positing a revolutionary theory from the less radical ideas of Hegel, Robinson instead suggests that Hegel in fact contributed far more directly to Marxism than Marx admitted. Indeed, Robinson demonstrates how Hegel’s conception of a universal class (to be Marx’s proletariat), secularization of history (making history happen), and privileging of Western civilization as the only society based on Reason (the secularization of social change) all made their way into Marxism, notwithstanding Marx’s dismissal of Hegel as a mystical idealist. Robinson historicizes Marxism by demonstrating how Kant’s formulation of the German bureaucracy as a class, followed by Hegel’s argument that this class’s consciousness came from its political work, were appropriated by Marx and Engels for their later work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国批判哲学与马克思
在这一章中,鲁滨逊探讨了构成马克思主义基础的德国知识分子。他将德国虔诚主义和教会的历史与康德唯物主义的发展联系起来,后者主张对德国社会秩序进行彻底的改革。接着,鲁滨逊论证了康德的德国唯心主义如何在德国思想中启动了一系列对马克思哲学至关重要的决定。虽然马克思因从黑格尔不那么激进的思想中提出革命性的理论而受到称赞,但罗宾逊却认为,黑格尔对马克思主义的贡献实际上比马克思所承认的要直接得多。事实上,罗宾逊论证了黑格尔的普遍阶级(马克思的无产阶级)、历史的世俗化(创造历史)以及西方文明作为唯一基于理性的社会的特权(社会变革的世俗化)是如何进入马克思主义的,尽管马克思认为黑格尔是一个神秘的唯心主义者。鲁滨逊将马克思主义历史化,他论证了康德将德国官僚体系作为一个阶级的表述,以及黑格尔关于这个阶级的意识来自其政治工作的论证,是如何被马克思和恩格斯运用到他们后来的著作中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reality and Its Representation The Social Origins of Materialism and Socialism German Critical Philosophy and Marx Coming to Terms with Marxian Taxonomy The Discourse on Economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1