Academics and Imaginary Communities

Lana F. Rakow
{"title":"Academics and Imaginary Communities","authors":"Lana F. Rakow","doi":"10.1177/1522637916656376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is more than a verbal tie between image, imagine, and imaginary to steal from the memorable association that John Dewey made in Democracy and Education (1916) between common, community, and communication. The choice of word sets here is neither accidental nor incidental: The tie between them has been given us by Benedict Anderson. His Imagined Communities (1983) has captured the imagination of academics, who have found his tale of nation-states cum communities a satisfying explanation of what has been otherwise a source of irritation, if not disdain. The notion of community has been out of favor among social scientists generally and among communication scholars in particular since the heyday of University of Chicago community studies. It is now academically fashionable to consider community a stifling regime of conformity, an outdated god term of progressivism, and too laden with positive baggage to be of analytical value.Clay Carey, however, puts community squarely before us for re-consideration. With Anderson's Imagined Communities as his guide, Carey invites us to imagine how the Amish and Mennonites who subscribe to a nationally distributed newspaper achieve a transcendent virtual community. Finessing Anderson's account, Carey describes The Budget, a 125-year-old weekly newspaper with a stable circulation of 18,000, as creating a community out of a religious diaspora rather than out of a nation-state. Its readers' identification with mostly strangers across distance derives from the newspaper's expression of shared values of faith, tradition, and social cohesion. Letters from scribes representing local settlements display the ongoing and reassuring routines of community life.Carey's respectful if uncritical description of the role of the newspaper and of the communal life it purports to represent provides us a set of challenges for understanding community and the news. Is a newspaper all it takes to pull off community in the minds and hearts of strangers? Do communities exist only in our imaginations without any material standing? How do we as scholars imagine the communities invoked and experienced by others? How do they, Amish and Mennonites, read this newspaper, both literally and figuratively, and what functions do they ascribe to it? Would they agree they are part of an imagined community? Are any of the grounds for community that are practiced locally and displayed in the newspaper contested or resisted? To explore these questions, we need to turn to some other thinking about communities and newspapers to see where they lead.Ontical CommunitiesThinking of community as a sense of shared identity achieved through the imagination, as Anderson does, has led to some academics who have appropriated Anderson's usage to apply it wholesale, too often without sufficient reflection or nuance. The material world, including our bodies, disappears from consideration when community is considered to be, in essence, all in our heads. Geographic and other tangible markers of shared identity can be ignored, which accords the concept a peculiar and unique status among other descriptors of social formations. One is hard-pressed to consider terms such as imagined capitalism or imagined racism or imagined democracy as adequate for these complex, multi-layered meanings that are experienced and put into practice in the material world. Why then community? As a result, Carey's invocation of Anderson as his almost sole explanation for the effect of The Budget on its readers short-changes the analysis. Carey himself claims to be demonstrating how an imagined community comes about by undertaking his own close reading of the newspaper. Carey, however, has grounds for a more original analysis of the connection between material, geographic communities and collective and individual identities across time and space than Anderson can offer.James Mackin's Community Over Chaos: An Ecological Perspective on Communication Ethics (1997) provides a counter view to Anderson's too simplistic imagined communities. …","PeriodicalId":147592,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637916656376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is more than a verbal tie between image, imagine, and imaginary to steal from the memorable association that John Dewey made in Democracy and Education (1916) between common, community, and communication. The choice of word sets here is neither accidental nor incidental: The tie between them has been given us by Benedict Anderson. His Imagined Communities (1983) has captured the imagination of academics, who have found his tale of nation-states cum communities a satisfying explanation of what has been otherwise a source of irritation, if not disdain. The notion of community has been out of favor among social scientists generally and among communication scholars in particular since the heyday of University of Chicago community studies. It is now academically fashionable to consider community a stifling regime of conformity, an outdated god term of progressivism, and too laden with positive baggage to be of analytical value.Clay Carey, however, puts community squarely before us for re-consideration. With Anderson's Imagined Communities as his guide, Carey invites us to imagine how the Amish and Mennonites who subscribe to a nationally distributed newspaper achieve a transcendent virtual community. Finessing Anderson's account, Carey describes The Budget, a 125-year-old weekly newspaper with a stable circulation of 18,000, as creating a community out of a religious diaspora rather than out of a nation-state. Its readers' identification with mostly strangers across distance derives from the newspaper's expression of shared values of faith, tradition, and social cohesion. Letters from scribes representing local settlements display the ongoing and reassuring routines of community life.Carey's respectful if uncritical description of the role of the newspaper and of the communal life it purports to represent provides us a set of challenges for understanding community and the news. Is a newspaper all it takes to pull off community in the minds and hearts of strangers? Do communities exist only in our imaginations without any material standing? How do we as scholars imagine the communities invoked and experienced by others? How do they, Amish and Mennonites, read this newspaper, both literally and figuratively, and what functions do they ascribe to it? Would they agree they are part of an imagined community? Are any of the grounds for community that are practiced locally and displayed in the newspaper contested or resisted? To explore these questions, we need to turn to some other thinking about communities and newspapers to see where they lead.Ontical CommunitiesThinking of community as a sense of shared identity achieved through the imagination, as Anderson does, has led to some academics who have appropriated Anderson's usage to apply it wholesale, too often without sufficient reflection or nuance. The material world, including our bodies, disappears from consideration when community is considered to be, in essence, all in our heads. Geographic and other tangible markers of shared identity can be ignored, which accords the concept a peculiar and unique status among other descriptors of social formations. One is hard-pressed to consider terms such as imagined capitalism or imagined racism or imagined democracy as adequate for these complex, multi-layered meanings that are experienced and put into practice in the material world. Why then community? As a result, Carey's invocation of Anderson as his almost sole explanation for the effect of The Budget on its readers short-changes the analysis. Carey himself claims to be demonstrating how an imagined community comes about by undertaking his own close reading of the newspaper. Carey, however, has grounds for a more original analysis of the connection between material, geographic communities and collective and individual identities across time and space than Anderson can offer.James Mackin's Community Over Chaos: An Ecological Perspective on Communication Ethics (1997) provides a counter view to Anderson's too simplistic imagined communities. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术与想象社区
从约翰·杜威在《民主与教育》(1916)中对公共、社区和交流所做的令人难忘的联想中可以看出,形象、想象和想象之间不仅仅是一种口头上的联系。这里的词集的选择既不是偶然的也不是偶然的:它们之间的联系是本尼迪克特·安德森给我们的。他的《想象的共同体》(1983)吸引了学者们的想象力,他们发现,他关于民族国家和共同体的故事,令人满意地解释了原本令人恼火(如果不是鄙视的话)的根源。自芝加哥大学社区研究的全盛时期以来,社区的概念在社会科学家中普遍不受欢迎,尤其是在传播学者中。现在学术界流行的观点是,社区是一种令人窒息的一致性制度,是一种过时的进步主义术语,而且承载了太多的积极包袱,不具备分析价值。然而,克莱·凯里把社区直接摆在我们面前,让我们重新考虑。凯里以安德森的《想象的社区》为指南,邀请我们想象一下,订阅一份全国发行的报纸的阿米什人和门诺派教徒是如何实现一个卓越的虚拟社区的。凯里对安德森的描述进行了精进,他将《预算》(The Budget)——一份拥有125年历史、稳定发行量1.8万份的周报——描述为在宗教流散中创造了一个社区,而不是从一个民族国家中创造了一个社区。它的读者对大多数陌生人的认同来自于报纸对信仰、传统和社会凝聚力等共同价值观的表达。来自代表当地定居点的书记员的信件显示了社区生活的持续和令人安心的日常生活。凯里对报纸和它所代表的社区生活的角色的不加批判的、尊重的描述,为我们理解社区和新闻提供了一系列挑战。一份报纸就能在陌生人的思想和心中建立起社区吗?社区只存在于我们的想象中,没有任何物质基础吗?作为学者,我们如何想象他人所唤起和体验的社区?他们,阿米什人和门诺派教徒,是如何阅读这份报纸的,无论是字面上的还是比喻上的,他们认为这份报纸有什么功能?他们会同意他们是一个想象社区的一部分吗?在当地实践并在报纸上展示的社区基础是否受到质疑或抵制?为了探索这些问题,我们需要转向一些关于社区和报纸的其他思考,看看它们会带来什么。正如安德森所做的那样,把社区看作是一种通过想象实现的共同身份感,这导致一些学者盗用安德森的用法,全面地应用它,往往没有充分的反思或细微的差别。当社区被认为本质上都存在于我们的头脑中时,包括我们的身体在内的物质世界就从考虑中消失了。地理和其他有形的共同身份标记可以被忽略,这使得这一概念在其他社会形态描述符中具有特殊和独特的地位。人们很难认为想象中的资本主义、想象中的种族主义或想象中的民主等术语足以表达这些复杂的、多层次的含义,这些含义是在物质世界中经历并付诸实践的。为什么是社区?因此,凯里引用安德森作为他对《预算》对读者影响的几乎唯一解释,这曲解了他的分析。凯里自己声称,他是在通过仔细阅读报纸来证明一个想象中的社区是如何形成的。然而,凯里有理由对物质、地理社区以及跨越时空的集体和个人身份之间的联系进行比安德森更有原创性的分析。詹姆斯·麦金(James Mackin)的《混乱之上的社区:传播伦理的生态视角》(1997)对安德森过于简单化的想象社区提出了相反的观点。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Busybodies With Time on Their Hands”: Accountability, Research, and Resistance Behind the Searchlight: Walter Lippmann and Press Reform The Recalcitrant U.S. Press How “Busybodies” Changed Journalism in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities for Local Journalism in Reinventing Political Coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1