Should We Do Away with Responsible Gambling?

Debi A. LaPlante, H. Gray, Sarah E. Nelson
{"title":"Should We Do Away with Responsible Gambling?","authors":"Debi A. LaPlante, H. Gray, Sarah E. Nelson","doi":"10.1093/med-psych/9780190074562.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These stakeholders discuss responsible gambling in the context of today’s gambling research environment. Currently, the field of gambling studies is in the midst of an unnecessarily combative research environment of accusations and innuendo that lean on the shadow of past industry funding abuses and masquerade as objectivity and empiricism. The authors indicate that this situation makes judgments regarding responsible gambling difficult. The authors illustrate this difficulty by discussing contemporary controversies related to psychological and biological gambling research, responsible gambling, and industry-funded gambling research, more generally. Following these discussions, the authors focus on the issue of responsible gambling in detail and provide perspective, as research scientists, for how responsible gambling efforts can effectively move forward in the current environment. The authors conclude the chapter by considering whether the escalating attacks on industry funding in gambling research are empirically warranted or, on the contrary, empirically ignorant, and whether gambling research and researchers can serve as models for achieving ethical industry partnerships in science.","PeriodicalId":384629,"journal":{"name":"Responsible Gambling","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Responsible Gambling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190074562.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

These stakeholders discuss responsible gambling in the context of today’s gambling research environment. Currently, the field of gambling studies is in the midst of an unnecessarily combative research environment of accusations and innuendo that lean on the shadow of past industry funding abuses and masquerade as objectivity and empiricism. The authors indicate that this situation makes judgments regarding responsible gambling difficult. The authors illustrate this difficulty by discussing contemporary controversies related to psychological and biological gambling research, responsible gambling, and industry-funded gambling research, more generally. Following these discussions, the authors focus on the issue of responsible gambling in detail and provide perspective, as research scientists, for how responsible gambling efforts can effectively move forward in the current environment. The authors conclude the chapter by considering whether the escalating attacks on industry funding in gambling research are empirically warranted or, on the contrary, empirically ignorant, and whether gambling research and researchers can serve as models for achieving ethical industry partnerships in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们应该取缔负责任的赌博吗?
这些利益相关者在今天的赌博研究环境的背景下讨论负责任的赌博。目前,赌博研究领域正处于一个不必要的充满指责和含沙射影的研究环境中,这些研究环境依赖于过去行业资金滥用的阴影,并伪装成客观和经验主义。作者指出,这种情况使得判断负责任的赌博变得困难。作者通过讨论与心理和生物赌博研究、负责任的赌博和行业资助的赌博研究有关的当代争议来说明这一困难。在这些讨论之后,作者详细讨论了负责任的赌博问题,并作为研究科学家,为负责任的赌博努力如何在当前环境中有效地向前发展提供了视角。作者在本章的最后考虑了对赌博研究中行业资助的不断升级的攻击是否有经验上的保证,或者相反,经验上的无知,以及赌博研究和研究人员是否可以作为在科学中实现道德行业伙伴关系的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible Gambling and Its Stakeholders Should We Do Away with Responsible Gambling? Are Responsible Gambling Programs Important? Gambling Expansion and Its Association with Disordered Gambling Trends The Status of Responsible Gaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1