A comparison of the core aspects of the ACM/IEEE Computer Science Curriculum 2013 Strawman report with the specified core of CC2001 and CS2008 review

L. Marshall
{"title":"A comparison of the core aspects of the ACM/IEEE Computer Science Curriculum 2013 Strawman report with the specified core of CC2001 and CS2008 review","authors":"L. Marshall","doi":"10.1145/2421277.2421281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the changes in the structure of the proposed volume for Computer Science of the ACM/IEEE curricula series for 2013 it is difficult to conceptualise what the extent of these changes are when reading the Strawman report. This paper is an attempt to quantify these changes. It discusses the core curricula as defined in the ACM/IEEE curricula volumes for Computer Science of 2001, 2008 Review and the 2013 Strawman report and shows how a real-world curriculum can be compared to the volumes.\n Both a visual comparison for the curricula volumes and an algorithmic comparison are presented. The visual comparison provides a quick indication that there are differences, while the algorithmic comparison provides a mechanism to quantify the differences and as a side effect the similarities. These comparisons are restricted to the core aspects of the curricula being evaluated and further to this subsections of the core curricula will be used for illustrative purposes in order to contain the complexity of curricula specifications.","PeriodicalId":131223,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education Research Conference","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Science Education Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2421277.2421281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

With the changes in the structure of the proposed volume for Computer Science of the ACM/IEEE curricula series for 2013 it is difficult to conceptualise what the extent of these changes are when reading the Strawman report. This paper is an attempt to quantify these changes. It discusses the core curricula as defined in the ACM/IEEE curricula volumes for Computer Science of 2001, 2008 Review and the 2013 Strawman report and shows how a real-world curriculum can be compared to the volumes. Both a visual comparison for the curricula volumes and an algorithmic comparison are presented. The visual comparison provides a quick indication that there are differences, while the algorithmic comparison provides a mechanism to quantify the differences and as a side effect the similarities. These comparisons are restricted to the core aspects of the curricula being evaluated and further to this subsections of the core curricula will be used for illustrative purposes in order to contain the complexity of curricula specifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACM/IEEE计算机科学课程2013 Strawman报告的核心内容与CC2001和CS2008审查的指定核心内容的比较
随着2013年ACM/IEEE计算机科学课程系列的拟议卷结构的变化,在阅读Strawman报告时很难概念化这些变化的程度。本文试图量化这些变化。它讨论了ACM/IEEE 2001年计算机科学课程卷、2008年评论和2013年斯特劳曼报告中定义的核心课程,并展示了如何将现实世界的课程与这些卷进行比较。课程卷的视觉比较和算法比较都被提出。视觉比较提供了一个快速指示存在差异,而算法比较提供了一种机制来量化差异和作为副作用的相似性。这些比较仅限于被评价课程的核心方面,为了说明课程规格的复杂性,将进一步使用核心课程的这一小节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gamification in educational software development The design of mobile apps: what and how to teach? Improving students' learning in software engineering education through multi-level assignments Strategy-based feedback in a programming tutor Beautiful JavaScript: how to guide students to create good and elegant code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1