The development of the public safety standard TETRA: lessons and recommendations for research managers and strategists in the security industry

S. Wurster, T. Egyedi, Anique Hommels
{"title":"The development of the public safety standard TETRA: lessons and recommendations for research managers and strategists in the security industry","authors":"S. Wurster, T. Egyedi, Anique Hommels","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we describe the European standardisation of Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) and try to draw lessons for European research managers who participate in national civil security research programmes and wish to develop standards related to their security-specific R&D results. This study challenges the findings from Weiss and Sirbu (1990), which suggest that the political skills of the sponsors of a technology are not significant for its adoption in a standardisation process. TETRA's establishment was shaped by specific people, specific skills and specific strategies. Our study shows the importance of political skills, as well as the relevance of multiple lobbying and negotiation activities in influencing the standardisation process. Specific national strategies in forging alliances, as well as lobbying on the European level were crucial, and their realisation offers lessons to learn from. Moreover, given the indisputable multinational dimension in many security issues, our article contains suggestions regarding dual national-European level standardisation strategies needed, for instance, in the context of the European security standardisation Mandate M/487. The TETRA case illustrates how to pursue such a dual level standardisation strategy successfully.","PeriodicalId":146847,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article we describe the European standardisation of Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) and try to draw lessons for European research managers who participate in national civil security research programmes and wish to develop standards related to their security-specific R&D results. This study challenges the findings from Weiss and Sirbu (1990), which suggest that the political skills of the sponsors of a technology are not significant for its adoption in a standardisation process. TETRA's establishment was shaped by specific people, specific skills and specific strategies. Our study shows the importance of political skills, as well as the relevance of multiple lobbying and negotiation activities in influencing the standardisation process. Specific national strategies in forging alliances, as well as lobbying on the European level were crucial, and their realisation offers lessons to learn from. Moreover, given the indisputable multinational dimension in many security issues, our article contains suggestions regarding dual national-European level standardisation strategies needed, for instance, in the context of the European security standardisation Mandate M/487. The TETRA case illustrates how to pursue such a dual level standardisation strategy successfully.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共安全标准TETRA的发展:对安全行业研究经理和战略家的教训和建议
在本文中,我们描述了欧洲陆地集群无线电(TETRA)的标准化,并试图为参与国家民用安全研究计划并希望制定与其安全特定研发成果相关的标准的欧洲研究管理人员提供经验教训。这项研究挑战了Weiss和Sirbu(1990)的研究结果,他们认为技术赞助者的政治技巧对其在标准化过程中的采用并不重要。TETRA的建立是由特定的人、特定的技能和特定的战略形成的。我们的研究显示了政治技巧的重要性,以及多种游说和谈判活动在影响标准化过程中的相关性。建立联盟的具体国家战略以及在欧洲层面的游说至关重要,它们的实现提供了值得借鉴的教训。此外,鉴于在许多安全问题中无可争议的多国维度,我们的文章包含了关于双重国家-欧洲层面标准化战略的建议,例如,在欧洲安全标准化授权M/487的背景下。TETRA的案例说明了如何成功地实施这种双重标准化战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of IPR policy revisions in the wake of antitrust actions How to perceive the (future) role of China in ICT standardisation - A European perspective Developing business model for Geo-location Database for the operation of cognitive radio in the TV White Space bands The development of the public safety standard TETRA: lessons and recommendations for research managers and strategists in the security industry Diffusion of internet protocols - Measurement framework and empirical analysis of the Finnish mobile market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1