Gasification Comparison between Plasma and Entrained Flow: Analysis of the Power Plant

L. Mazzoni, I. Janajreh, S. Elagroudy
{"title":"Gasification Comparison between Plasma and Entrained Flow: Analysis of the Power Plant","authors":"L. Mazzoni, I. Janajreh, S. Elagroudy","doi":"10.1109/IRSEC.2018.8702938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, the plasma gasification is assessed and compared to the conventional entrained flow technology in an equilibrium-based power plant gasification simulation model. The two power plant models are developed within Aspen Plus environment representing an integrated plasma- and entrained flow-gasification combined cycles (IPGCC, and IGCC). They are fed with abundant feedstock consists of MSW and Petroleum Hydrocarbon Waste sludge (PHW). These are initially analyzed according to their proximate and ultimate analyses. Thereafter, using Abu Dhabi city with a population of nearly 2,000,000 residents the total amount of generated waste is estimated. Next, different parametric studies are carried out under variable oxidizer fraction and MSW-PHW co-gasification mixture. It was found, at a daily feed of 1,338 tons consisting of 90% MSW and 10% PHW, the total electrical power generation is 81 MW using IPGCC plant and 100.2 MW using IGCC. The corresponding overall efficiencies are 33.6% for the former and 41.4% for the later.","PeriodicalId":186042,"journal":{"name":"2018 6th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 6th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC.2018.8702938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, the plasma gasification is assessed and compared to the conventional entrained flow technology in an equilibrium-based power plant gasification simulation model. The two power plant models are developed within Aspen Plus environment representing an integrated plasma- and entrained flow-gasification combined cycles (IPGCC, and IGCC). They are fed with abundant feedstock consists of MSW and Petroleum Hydrocarbon Waste sludge (PHW). These are initially analyzed according to their proximate and ultimate analyses. Thereafter, using Abu Dhabi city with a population of nearly 2,000,000 residents the total amount of generated waste is estimated. Next, different parametric studies are carried out under variable oxidizer fraction and MSW-PHW co-gasification mixture. It was found, at a daily feed of 1,338 tons consisting of 90% MSW and 10% PHW, the total electrical power generation is 81 MW using IPGCC plant and 100.2 MW using IGCC. The corresponding overall efficiencies are 33.6% for the former and 41.4% for the later.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等离子体与夹带流气化的比较:电厂分析
本文在基于平衡的电厂气化模拟模型中对等离子体气化进行了评估,并与传统夹带流技术进行了比较。这两个电厂模型是在Aspen Plus环境中开发的,代表了一个集成的等离子体和夹带流气化联合循环(IPGCC和IGCC)。它们以城市生活垃圾和石油烃废污泥(PHW)为原料。根据它们的近似值和最终值进行初步分析。此后,以人口近200万的阿布扎比市为例,估算产生的垃圾总量。其次,在不同的氧化剂分数和生活垃圾- phw共气化混合物下进行了不同的参数研究。研究发现,在日投料为1338吨,其中90%为生活垃圾,10%为PHW的情况下,IPGCC装置的总发电量为81兆瓦,IGCC装置的总发电量为100.2兆瓦。前者的总效率为33.6%,后者为41.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Structural and Modal Analysis of a Wind Turbine Planetary Gear Based on Material Cut Criteria using FEM Formulation And Thermal Potentials Of An Eco-Material For Civil Engeneering Structural Analysis of Wind Turbine Epicyclical Gear System by FEM Electrification of Rural and Arid Areas by Solar Energy Applications Control Strategies of PMSG Wind Energy Conversion System Based on Five Level NPC Converter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1