A Living Labs Approach to Manage Co-created Design Knowledge through Ideation Artefacts

Johan Breytenbach, Ilse Kariem
{"title":"A Living Labs Approach to Manage Co-created Design Knowledge through Ideation Artefacts","authors":"Johan Breytenbach, Ilse Kariem","doi":"10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.245373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a Senian understanding of intellectual capital as being a function of agent capability and contextual resource constraints, the requirement for knowledge in the digital economy to be co-created by a network of agents is obvious. From network agents co-creating knowledge for the digital economy as a foundational point of departure, we problematize the management of this co-created knowledge. As network power shifts, so does the foundational capabilities and contexts. As demonstrated by the increased use of multiple stakeholder groups to co-create innovative solutions. These stakeholder groups are commonly classified as Triple helix, Quadruple helix, n Tuple helix. The problems caused by shifts in network power and agent capabilities become apparent in co-creative systems design processes such as Living Labs and popular Design Science frameworks. As the disruptive power of digital change creates shifts in the foundational design network’s agency, knowledge is lost. We postulate that it is typically highly technical design knowledge - created at a high cost during co-creation - that is lost first. We present examples of technical design knowledge flowing out of the network from a local Smart Community design case. Towards the prevention of co-created design knowledge loss as a result of changes in the foundational network, we suggest the use of physical ideation artefacts for the storage, management, and continued dissemination of the knowledge within the network. We present a case study where local, co-created, technical, Smart Community design knowledge was stored explicitly as ideation artefacts called “tech cards” and retained over time within the network after highly disruptive shifts in the capability set of the foundational agent network responsible for the original knowledge creation. The co-creation of physical, knowledge-rich ideation artefacts as part of system design processes such as Living Labs shows promise as a Knowledge Management tool (KMT) amidst fast paced digital change in the knowledge economy.","PeriodicalId":129517,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.245373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With a Senian understanding of intellectual capital as being a function of agent capability and contextual resource constraints, the requirement for knowledge in the digital economy to be co-created by a network of agents is obvious. From network agents co-creating knowledge for the digital economy as a foundational point of departure, we problematize the management of this co-created knowledge. As network power shifts, so does the foundational capabilities and contexts. As demonstrated by the increased use of multiple stakeholder groups to co-create innovative solutions. These stakeholder groups are commonly classified as Triple helix, Quadruple helix, n Tuple helix. The problems caused by shifts in network power and agent capabilities become apparent in co-creative systems design processes such as Living Labs and popular Design Science frameworks. As the disruptive power of digital change creates shifts in the foundational design network’s agency, knowledge is lost. We postulate that it is typically highly technical design knowledge - created at a high cost during co-creation - that is lost first. We present examples of technical design knowledge flowing out of the network from a local Smart Community design case. Towards the prevention of co-created design knowledge loss as a result of changes in the foundational network, we suggest the use of physical ideation artefacts for the storage, management, and continued dissemination of the knowledge within the network. We present a case study where local, co-created, technical, Smart Community design knowledge was stored explicitly as ideation artefacts called “tech cards” and retained over time within the network after highly disruptive shifts in the capability set of the foundational agent network responsible for the original knowledge creation. The co-creation of physical, knowledge-rich ideation artefacts as part of system design processes such as Living Labs shows promise as a Knowledge Management tool (KMT) amidst fast paced digital change in the knowledge economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过创意人工制品管理共同创造设计知识的生活实验室方法
基于Senian对智力资本的理解,智力资本是代理能力和环境资源约束的函数,数字经济中对知识的需求是由代理网络共同创造的。从网络代理为数字经济共同创造知识作为一个基本点出发,我们对这种共同创造知识的管理提出了问题。随着网络力量的转移,基础能力和环境也在发生变化。正如越来越多地利用多个利益攸关方团体共同创造创新解决方案所证明的那样。这些利益相关者群体通常分为三螺旋、四螺旋和四螺旋。在Living Labs和流行的design Science框架等共同创造系统设计过程中,由网络力量和代理能力的变化所引起的问题变得很明显。随着数字变革的颠覆性力量在基础设计网络的代理机构中产生变化,知识也随之流失。我们假设,首先丢失的是典型的高技术性设计知识——在共同创造过程中以高成本创造出来的知识。我们从一个本地的智慧社区设计案例中展示了技术设计知识从网络流出的例子。为了防止共同创造的设计知识因基础网络的变化而丢失,我们建议在网络中使用物理创意人工制品来存储、管理和持续传播知识。我们提出了一个案例研究,其中本地的、共同创造的、技术的智能社区设计知识被明确地存储为称为“技术卡”的创意人工产品,并在负责原始知识创造的基础代理网络的能力集发生高度破坏性变化后,随着时间的推移在网络中保留下来。作为系统设计过程的一部分,共同创造物理的、知识丰富的创意工件,如Living Labs,在知识经济中快节奏的数字变革中显示出作为知识管理工具(KMT)的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Techno-progressivism: E-destination and Super-Connectedness Divulge from Travel Marketers Research on the Construction of Strategic Decision-making Platform of Science and Technology Think Tank Based on Multi-agent Collaboration Wearable Technology in Health Care – Acceptance and Technical Requirements for Medical Information Systems Who is Generating New Innovations? : An Analysis of Blockchain Engineers Improving Government Decision Making in Africa through Digital Data Collection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1