Falling from Heaven to Earth

Chengjun Wang
{"title":"Falling from Heaven to Earth","authors":"Chengjun Wang","doi":"10.5840/asrr202011168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Qigong movement was one of the most remarkable New Religious Movements, and one of the most important social and cultural phenomena in China during 1980s–1990s. It rose rapidly and created what was termed a “fever” in a very short time in Post-Mao China, and then suddenly fell off the late 1990s. This paper analyzes how and why Qigong, as a new religion, endured such a drastic change within specific political, economic and cultural contexts in China across the course of twenty years. It argues that the rise of Qigong can be mainly ascribed to people’s urgent need for the promotion of health, eagerness to restore national pride, and the change of people’s lifestyle and mindset in response to the “Reform and Opening-up” subsequent to 1978. The collapse of the movement could be seen as an unavoidable result from certain intrinsic and extrinsic factors, namely, the natural tensions between Qigong itself and the national political authorities as well as the scientific establishment, harmful outcomes it produced among some practitioners, and the change in the social and cultural contexts that fostered qigong. In general, it is plausible to say that both its rise and fall were products of the time China underwent subsequent to the “Reform and Opening-up” period.","PeriodicalId":187018,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr202011168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Qigong movement was one of the most remarkable New Religious Movements, and one of the most important social and cultural phenomena in China during 1980s–1990s. It rose rapidly and created what was termed a “fever” in a very short time in Post-Mao China, and then suddenly fell off the late 1990s. This paper analyzes how and why Qigong, as a new religion, endured such a drastic change within specific political, economic and cultural contexts in China across the course of twenty years. It argues that the rise of Qigong can be mainly ascribed to people’s urgent need for the promotion of health, eagerness to restore national pride, and the change of people’s lifestyle and mindset in response to the “Reform and Opening-up” subsequent to 1978. The collapse of the movement could be seen as an unavoidable result from certain intrinsic and extrinsic factors, namely, the natural tensions between Qigong itself and the national political authorities as well as the scientific establishment, harmful outcomes it produced among some practitioners, and the change in the social and cultural contexts that fostered qigong. In general, it is plausible to say that both its rise and fall were products of the time China underwent subsequent to the “Reform and Opening-up” period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从天堂坠落到人间
气功运动是20世纪80年代至90年代中国最引人注目的新兴宗教运动之一,也是中国最重要的社会文化现象之一。本文分析了气功作为一种新的宗教,在中国特定的政治、经济和文化背景下,如何以及为什么在过去的二十年中经历了如此巨大的变化。认为气功的兴起主要是由于人们对促进健康的迫切需要,对恢复民族自豪感的渴望,以及1978年以后“改革开放”后人们生活方式和思维方式的改变。气功运动的崩溃可以看作是一些内在和外在因素不可避免的结果,即气功本身与国家政治当局以及科学机构之间的自然紧张关系,它在一些练习者中产生的有害后果,以及培育气功的社会和文化背景的变化。总的来说,可以说它的兴衰都是改革开放后中国所经历的时代的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern and Form in advance Becoming the Gods: Visualisation and Healing in Tibetan Deity Yoga in advance Orara: Rituals of Rule, Spiritism, and Popular Culture in Oye–Ekiti, Southwest Nigeria in advance Falling from Heaven to Earth The Potential Illegitimacy of the PRC’s Effort to Distinguish from “Cult” or “Destructive Cult”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1