Spectrum of postoperative admissions in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital: An Indian update

Vijay Singh, R. Datta, S. Sasidharan, Lalit Tomar
{"title":"Spectrum of postoperative admissions in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital: An Indian update","authors":"Vijay Singh, R. Datta, S. Sasidharan, Lalit Tomar","doi":"10.4103/sccj.sccj_24_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The allocation of intensive care unit (ICU) beds for postoperative patients is a difficult task because of expensive and limited resources. Hence, it is imperative that it requires stratification of patients who most deserve ICU admission. With this background, this study was conducted to do a prospective evaluation of postoperative admissions in the ICU over a period of 1 year to analyze the postoperative admissions to the ICU and to formulate recommendations based on limited resources. Aim: To analyze the postoperative admissions to the ICU and to formulate recommendations based on limited resources. Settings and Design: The study was done in a tertiary level teaching hospital in India, over a period of 1 year. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria admitted to the surgical ICU were analyzed in the study as per method designed. Materials and Methods: Postoperative patients were admitted to ICU into three groups: (1) planned, (2) unplanned, and (3) emergency. The study analyzed American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, preplanned postoperative ventilation, not reversed due to intraoperative complications (which included those patients who developed intraoperative complications and admitted to ICU for postoperative ventilation), postoperative observation (which included those patients who were admitted to ICU only for monitoring and didn't experience any anticipated perioperative complications) and others causes group. Statistical Analysis: All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20. Results: In 1 year, total patients operated were 18157 and 261 patients were admitted to ICU. In planned group, maximum patients were ASA III and in unplanned/emergency admissions ASA II. The common cause of postoperative ICU admission in the planned group was postoperative observation (58.80%; 124/211) and in unplanned/emergency group, it was other causes. Maximum patients admitted to ICU were of ASA III (59.40%; 155/261) and for postoperative observation 54.80% (85/155). Conclusions: The authors have a valuable consideration into our standards of anesthetic practice to improve the process of allocating ICU beds for postoperative patient.","PeriodicalId":345799,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sccj.sccj_24_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The allocation of intensive care unit (ICU) beds for postoperative patients is a difficult task because of expensive and limited resources. Hence, it is imperative that it requires stratification of patients who most deserve ICU admission. With this background, this study was conducted to do a prospective evaluation of postoperative admissions in the ICU over a period of 1 year to analyze the postoperative admissions to the ICU and to formulate recommendations based on limited resources. Aim: To analyze the postoperative admissions to the ICU and to formulate recommendations based on limited resources. Settings and Design: The study was done in a tertiary level teaching hospital in India, over a period of 1 year. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria admitted to the surgical ICU were analyzed in the study as per method designed. Materials and Methods: Postoperative patients were admitted to ICU into three groups: (1) planned, (2) unplanned, and (3) emergency. The study analyzed American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, preplanned postoperative ventilation, not reversed due to intraoperative complications (which included those patients who developed intraoperative complications and admitted to ICU for postoperative ventilation), postoperative observation (which included those patients who were admitted to ICU only for monitoring and didn't experience any anticipated perioperative complications) and others causes group. Statistical Analysis: All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20. Results: In 1 year, total patients operated were 18157 and 261 patients were admitted to ICU. In planned group, maximum patients were ASA III and in unplanned/emergency admissions ASA II. The common cause of postoperative ICU admission in the planned group was postoperative observation (58.80%; 124/211) and in unplanned/emergency group, it was other causes. Maximum patients admitted to ICU were of ASA III (59.40%; 155/261) and for postoperative observation 54.80% (85/155). Conclusions: The authors have a valuable consideration into our standards of anesthetic practice to improve the process of allocating ICU beds for postoperative patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级护理医院重症监护室术后住院谱:印度的最新情况
背景:由于资源有限且价格昂贵,为术后患者分配重症监护病房(ICU)床位是一项艰巨的任务。因此,迫切需要对最值得ICU住院的患者进行分层。在此背景下,本研究对1年的ICU术后入院情况进行前瞻性评估,分析ICU术后入院情况,并在资源有限的情况下提出建议。目的:分析ICU术后住院情况,在资源有限的情况下提出建议。环境和设计:本研究在印度的一家三级教学医院进行,为期1年。按照设计的方法对所有符合纳入标准的外科ICU患者进行分析。材料与方法:将术后入住ICU的患者分为(1)计划组、(2)计划组、(3)急诊组。本研究分析了美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)状态、术后预计划通气、未因术中并发症逆转通气(包括术中出现并发症并入住ICU进行术后通气的患者)、术后观察(包括仅入住ICU进行监护且未出现任何预期围手术期并发症的患者)及其他原因组。统计分析:采用SPSS 20进行统计分析。结果:1年内共手术患者18157例,ICU住院261例。在计划组中,最多的患者为ASA III,而在非计划/急诊入院组中,最多的患者为ASA II。计划组术后住院的常见原因为术后观察(58.80%);124/211),而在计划外/紧急情况组,则是其他原因。入住ICU的患者以ASA III型最多(59.40%);术后观察54.80%(85/155)。结论:作者对我们的麻醉实践标准进行了有价值的考虑,以改善术后患者ICU床位的分配过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A National Survey of Kuwaiti Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Specialists Characteristics and outcomes of adolescents requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: A national survey of Kuwaiti infectious diseases and critical care specialists Use of critical care ultrasound in Saudi Arabia: Questionnaire analysis Effects of different regimens of sedation on mechanically ventilated patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1