Learning from listening: common concerns and perceptions about diabetes prevention among diverse American populations.

D. Satterfield, T. Lofton, J. May, B. Bowman, Ana Alfaro-Correa, Christopher Benjamin, M. Stankus
{"title":"Learning from listening: common concerns and perceptions about diabetes prevention among diverse American populations.","authors":"D. Satterfield, T. Lofton, J. May, B. Bowman, Ana Alfaro-Correa, Christopher Benjamin, M. Stankus","doi":"10.1097/00124784-200311001-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research findings confirming the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes are of keen interest to many stakeholders, including communities from which diabetes exacts a heavy toll. To inform communication and program planners at national and local levels, the Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, turned to people and communities affected by diabetes for their views about diabetes prevention. We review the key themes that emerged across diverse populations and some examples of subthemes relevant to particular groups. Adults at risk for type 2 diabetes and community leaders from five racial and ethnic groups participated in 27 focus groups from five geographic locations across the country. We explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about diabetes and factors that would enable or impede lifestyle interventions at individual and community levels. Multiple analysts categorized responses using the qualitative technique of constant comparison. Many themes, some cutting across groups and some unique to specific groups, emerged about the negative effect of modern lifestyles on the health of adults and children. But positive findings about diabetes prevention generated hope that diabetes was not inevitable. All the focus groups noted that interventions were difficult to initiate and maintain and that social support, modeling stories, and community connections were needed. Listening to community members identified common and group-specific themes. These findings can inform health promotion messages and support adaptive community interventions for diabetes prevention.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200311001-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Recent research findings confirming the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes are of keen interest to many stakeholders, including communities from which diabetes exacts a heavy toll. To inform communication and program planners at national and local levels, the Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, turned to people and communities affected by diabetes for their views about diabetes prevention. We review the key themes that emerged across diverse populations and some examples of subthemes relevant to particular groups. Adults at risk for type 2 diabetes and community leaders from five racial and ethnic groups participated in 27 focus groups from five geographic locations across the country. We explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about diabetes and factors that would enable or impede lifestyle interventions at individual and community levels. Multiple analysts categorized responses using the qualitative technique of constant comparison. Many themes, some cutting across groups and some unique to specific groups, emerged about the negative effect of modern lifestyles on the health of adults and children. But positive findings about diabetes prevention generated hope that diabetes was not inevitable. All the focus groups noted that interventions were difficult to initiate and maintain and that social support, modeling stories, and community connections were needed. Listening to community members identified common and group-specific themes. These findings can inform health promotion messages and support adaptive community interventions for diabetes prevention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从倾听中学习:不同美国人群对糖尿病预防的共同关注和看法。
最近的研究结果证实了预防或延迟2型糖尿病发病的干预措施的可行性和有效性,这引起了许多利益相关者的浓厚兴趣,包括糖尿病造成严重伤亡的社区。为了向国家和地方各级的沟通和项目规划者提供信息,疾病控制和预防中心的糖尿病翻译部门转向受糖尿病影响的人和社区,了解他们对糖尿病预防的看法。我们回顾了在不同人群中出现的关键主题以及与特定群体相关的次级主题的一些例子。来自5个种族和民族的有2型糖尿病风险的成年人和社区领导人参加了来自全国5个地理位置的27个焦点小组。我们探讨了参与者对糖尿病的知识、态度和信念,以及在个人和社区层面上支持或阻碍生活方式干预的因素。多名分析人员使用不断比较的定性技术对回答进行分类。关于现代生活方式对成人和儿童健康的负面影响,出现了许多主题,有些是跨群体的,有些是特定群体特有的。但是,关于糖尿病预防的积极发现给人们带来了希望,即糖尿病并非不可避免。所有焦点小组都注意到,干预措施很难启动和维持,需要社会支持、示范故事和社区联系。听取社区成员的意见,确定共同的和特定于群体的主题。这些发现可以为健康促进信息提供信息,并为糖尿病预防的适应性社区干预提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1