Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.

Stefanie Carignan, Ruth Lindberg, Gregory J Tung, Jennifer Sullivan, Cynthia Stone, Keshia M. Pollack Porter
{"title":"Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.","authors":"Stefanie Carignan, Ruth Lindberg, Gregory J Tung, Jennifer Sullivan, Cynthia Stone, Keshia M. Pollack Porter","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nIn 2018, the Health Impact Project (the Project) developed and tested a new health in all policies (HiAP) tool called \"legislative health notes\" to provide state and local legislators with peer-reviewed evidence, public health data, and local data that illustrate potential positive and negative health and equity effects of proposed bills.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe Project sought to refine the health note methodology while piloting the tool in the Colorado and Indiana General Assemblies, and with the Council of the District of Columbia, and worked with affiliates to introduce them in North Carolina, Ohio, and California.\n\n\nDESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS\nExternal partners solicited feedback on health notes via semistructured interviews and surveys from legislators, legislative staff, and expert reviewers who were familiar with health notes in each of these jurisdictions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRespondents shared that health notes were nonpartisan, were easy for nonexperts to understand, and would be more effective if delivered earlier in the legislative process.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIn response to informant feedback, practitioners can explore adding high-level summaries, increasing focus on health equity implications and the potential to work with legislators during the policy formulation phase. Data from this pilot suggest that legislative health notes are a promising nonpartisan and standardized tool to better understand the health and equity implications of proposed legislation.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"12 1","pages":"E135-E142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT In 2018, the Health Impact Project (the Project) developed and tested a new health in all policies (HiAP) tool called "legislative health notes" to provide state and local legislators with peer-reviewed evidence, public health data, and local data that illustrate potential positive and negative health and equity effects of proposed bills. OBJECTIVES The Project sought to refine the health note methodology while piloting the tool in the Colorado and Indiana General Assemblies, and with the Council of the District of Columbia, and worked with affiliates to introduce them in North Carolina, Ohio, and California. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS External partners solicited feedback on health notes via semistructured interviews and surveys from legislators, legislative staff, and expert reviewers who were familiar with health notes in each of these jurisdictions. RESULTS Respondents shared that health notes were nonpartisan, were easy for nonexperts to understand, and would be more effective if delivered earlier in the legislative process. CONCLUSION In response to informant feedback, practitioners can explore adding high-level summaries, increasing focus on health equity implications and the potential to work with legislators during the policy formulation phase. Data from this pilot suggest that legislative health notes are a promising nonpartisan and standardized tool to better understand the health and equity implications of proposed legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法健康笔记:新政策分析工具试点的初步经验。
CONTEXTIn 2018 年,健康影响项目(以下简称 "项目")开发并测试了一种名为 "立法健康说明 "的新的 "所有政策中的健康"(HiAP)工具,为州和地方立法者提供经同行评审的证据、公共卫生数据和地方数据,以说明拟议法案可能对健康和公平产生的积极和消极影响。目标该项目的目标是在科罗拉多州和印第安纳州议会以及哥伦比亚特区议会试用该工具的同时,完善健康说明方法,并与附属机构合作在北卡罗来纳州、俄亥俄州和加利福尼亚州引入该工具。设计与参与者外部合作伙伴通过半结构化访谈和调查的方式,向立法者、立法人员以及熟悉这些司法管辖区健康笔记的专家评审员征集对健康笔记的反馈意见。结果受访者认为健康说明不带党派色彩,非专业人士也很容易理解,如果能在立法过程中更早提供,效果会更好。结论根据受访者的反馈,从业人员可以探索增加高层次摘要,更加关注健康公平的影响以及在政策制定阶段与立法者合作的可能性。本次试点的数据表明,立法健康说明是一种很有前途的非党派标准化工具,可以更好地了解拟议立法对健康和公平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1