One-dimensional vs. two-dimensional based features: Plant identification approach

Q1 Mathematics Journal of Applied Logic Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.021
Alaa Tharwat , Tarek Gaber , Aboul Ella Hassanien
{"title":"One-dimensional vs. two-dimensional based features: Plant identification approach","authors":"Alaa Tharwat ,&nbsp;Tarek Gaber ,&nbsp;Aboul Ella Hassanien","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of endangered species has been increased due to shifts in the agricultural production, climate change, and poor urban planning. This has led to investigating new methods to address the problem of plant species identification/classification. In this paper, a plant identification approach using 2D digital leaves images was proposed. The approach used two features extraction methods based on one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) and the Bagging classifier. For the 1D-based methods, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Direct Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA), and PCA<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->LDA techniques were applied, while 2DPCA and 2DLDA algorithms were used for the 2D-based method. To classify the extracted features in both methods, the Bagging classifier, with the decision tree as a weak learner was used. The five variants, i.e. PCA, PCA<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->LDA, DLDA, 2DPCA, and 2DLDA, of the approach were tested using the Flavia public dataset which consists of 1907 colored leaves images. The accuracy of these variants was evaluated and the results showed that the 2DPCA and 2DLDA methods were much better than using the PCA, PCA<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->LDA, and DLDA. Furthermore, it was found that the 2DLDA method was the best one and the increase of the weak learners of the Bagging classifier yielded a better classification accuracy. Also, a comparison with the most related work showed that our approach achieved better accuracy under the same dataset and same experimental setup.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logic","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 15-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.021","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868316300775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The number of endangered species has been increased due to shifts in the agricultural production, climate change, and poor urban planning. This has led to investigating new methods to address the problem of plant species identification/classification. In this paper, a plant identification approach using 2D digital leaves images was proposed. The approach used two features extraction methods based on one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) and the Bagging classifier. For the 1D-based methods, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Direct Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA), and PCA + LDA techniques were applied, while 2DPCA and 2DLDA algorithms were used for the 2D-based method. To classify the extracted features in both methods, the Bagging classifier, with the decision tree as a weak learner was used. The five variants, i.e. PCA, PCA + LDA, DLDA, 2DPCA, and 2DLDA, of the approach were tested using the Flavia public dataset which consists of 1907 colored leaves images. The accuracy of these variants was evaluated and the results showed that the 2DPCA and 2DLDA methods were much better than using the PCA, PCA + LDA, and DLDA. Furthermore, it was found that the 2DLDA method was the best one and the increase of the weak learners of the Bagging classifier yielded a better classification accuracy. Also, a comparison with the most related work showed that our approach achieved better accuracy under the same dataset and same experimental setup.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一维与二维特征:植物识别方法
由于农业生产的变化、气候变化和城市规划不善,濒危物种的数量有所增加。这导致了研究解决植物物种鉴定/分类问题的新方法。本文提出了一种基于二维数字叶片图像的植物识别方法。该方法采用了基于一维(1D)和二维(2D)的两种特征提取方法以及Bagging分类器。基于一维的方法采用主成分分析(PCA)、直接线性判别分析(DLDA)和PCA + LDA技术,基于二维的方法采用2DPCA和2DLDA算法。为了对两种方法提取的特征进行分类,使用了Bagging分类器,并将决策树作为弱学习器。利用Flavia公共数据集(包含1907张彩色叶片图像)对该方法的PCA、PCA + LDA、DLDA、2DPCA和2DLDA 5种变体进行了测试。结果表明,2DPCA和2DLDA方法的准确率明显优于PCA、PCA + LDA和DLDA方法。此外,发现2DLDA方法是最好的方法,增加Bagging分类器的弱学习器可以提高分类精度。此外,与大多数相关工作的比较表明,在相同的数据集和相同的实验设置下,我们的方法取得了更好的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logic
Journal of Applied Logic COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
1.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Formal analysis of SEU mitigation for early dependability and performability analysis of FPGA-based space applications Logical Investigations on Assertion and Denial Natural deduction for bi-intuitionistic logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1