The Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Instruments for Cloud Computing Acceptance Study

M. T. Amron, Roslina Ibrahim, N. A. A. Bakar, S. Chuprat
{"title":"The Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Instruments for Cloud Computing Acceptance Study","authors":"M. T. Amron, Roslina Ibrahim, N. A. A. Bakar, S. Chuprat","doi":"10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online data storage technology over the cloud network has become an option for many organizations, even for personal use. The benefits of cloud computing enable many organizations, including the public sector, to use this technology to provide the best service experience. However, there is an issue with the implementation of cloud-based applications when their usage is less than the number of applications offered. Therefore, a study on the acceptance of cloud computing in the public sector should be conducted. This paper aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the instrument for cloud computing acceptance in Malaysian public sectors. The developed instruments are analyzed through validity and reliability phases. The validity analysis phase involves two stages of face validity and expert validity. The Content Validity Index (CVI) is used, and the feedback of the panel is considered in improving the items used. The reliability phase was conducted by performing an analysis to evaluate Cronbach ‘alpha for each item and also testing using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The final instrument contained 71 items of 5-point Likert scale multiple-choice options, classified under 15 variables. As a result, this instrument is successfully validated and are reliable to be used in the actual data collection.","PeriodicalId":129517,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Online data storage technology over the cloud network has become an option for many organizations, even for personal use. The benefits of cloud computing enable many organizations, including the public sector, to use this technology to provide the best service experience. However, there is an issue with the implementation of cloud-based applications when their usage is less than the number of applications offered. Therefore, a study on the acceptance of cloud computing in the public sector should be conducted. This paper aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the instrument for cloud computing acceptance in Malaysian public sectors. The developed instruments are analyzed through validity and reliability phases. The validity analysis phase involves two stages of face validity and expert validity. The Content Validity Index (CVI) is used, and the feedback of the panel is considered in improving the items used. The reliability phase was conducted by performing an analysis to evaluate Cronbach ‘alpha for each item and also testing using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The final instrument contained 71 items of 5-point Likert scale multiple-choice options, classified under 15 variables. As a result, this instrument is successfully validated and are reliable to be used in the actual data collection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
云计算验收研究中仪器的效度和可靠性评估
云网络上的在线数据存储技术已经成为许多组织的一种选择,甚至个人使用。云计算的好处使许多组织(包括公共部门)能够使用这种技术来提供最佳的服务体验。但是,当基于云的应用程序的使用量少于所提供的应用程序数量时,实现基于云的应用程序会遇到一个问题。因此,应该对云计算在公共部门的接受程度进行研究。本文旨在评估马来西亚公共部门接受云计算的有效性和可靠性。对所研制的仪器进行了效度和信度分析。效度分析阶段包括面孔效度和专家效度两个阶段。采用了内容效度指数(Content Validity Index, CVI),并在改进所使用的项目时考虑了小组的反馈。可靠性阶段通过对每个项目的Cronbach ' alpha进行分析,并使用探索性因子分析(EFA)进行测试。最终的工具包含71项李克特5分多选题,分为15个变量。结果表明,该仪器验证成功,可可靠地用于实际数据采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Techno-progressivism: E-destination and Super-Connectedness Divulge from Travel Marketers Research on the Construction of Strategic Decision-making Platform of Science and Technology Think Tank Based on Multi-agent Collaboration Wearable Technology in Health Care – Acceptance and Technical Requirements for Medical Information Systems Who is Generating New Innovations? : An Analysis of Blockchain Engineers Improving Government Decision Making in Africa through Digital Data Collection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1