Stress and Coping in IAPT Staff: a Mixed Methods Study

Elaine Walklet, C. Percy
{"title":"Stress and Coping in IAPT Staff: a Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Elaine Walklet, C. Percy","doi":"10.18552/APRJ.V1I2.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research indicates National Health Service (NHS) mental health workers have particularly high levels of stress. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is an NHS mental health service with new ways of working. Aims: This exploratory study sought to investigate whether IAPT staff experience high levels of stress and, moreover, identify sources of stress and ways of coping. \nMethod: A mixed methods design was utilised. Forty four IAPT workers completed a quantitative survey in which prevalence of stress (GHQ-12) and dispositional coping styles (COPE) were measured. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 6 staff and analysed using thematic analysis. \nResults: Almost 30% of IAPT staff reached criteria for minor psychiatric morbidity. Identified stressors included high volume and target orientated work, constant change, resource issues, team dynamics, demands of high stakes in-service training, managing and holding distress and risk, and home-work conflict. Greater engagement in acceptance and active coping styles related to lower stress, whereas focusing on and venting emotions related to higher stress. \nConclusions: Stress is an issue for IAPT staff, with newly reported stressors including emphasis on targets and high stakes in-service training. Interventions aimed at promoting acceptance and active coping may be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":201507,"journal":{"name":"applied psychological research journal","volume":"435 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"applied psychological research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/APRJ.V1I2.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Research indicates National Health Service (NHS) mental health workers have particularly high levels of stress. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is an NHS mental health service with new ways of working. Aims: This exploratory study sought to investigate whether IAPT staff experience high levels of stress and, moreover, identify sources of stress and ways of coping. Method: A mixed methods design was utilised. Forty four IAPT workers completed a quantitative survey in which prevalence of stress (GHQ-12) and dispositional coping styles (COPE) were measured. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 6 staff and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Almost 30% of IAPT staff reached criteria for minor psychiatric morbidity. Identified stressors included high volume and target orientated work, constant change, resource issues, team dynamics, demands of high stakes in-service training, managing and holding distress and risk, and home-work conflict. Greater engagement in acceptance and active coping styles related to lower stress, whereas focusing on and venting emotions related to higher stress. Conclusions: Stress is an issue for IAPT staff, with newly reported stressors including emphasis on targets and high stakes in-service training. Interventions aimed at promoting acceptance and active coping may be beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IAPT员工的压力与应对:一项混合方法研究
背景:研究表明,国民健康服务(NHS)的精神卫生工作者的压力水平特别高。改善获得心理治疗的机会(IAPT)是一项具有新工作方式的NHS心理健康服务。目的:本探索性研究旨在调查IAPT员工是否经历高水平的压力,此外,确定压力的来源和应对方式。方法:采用混合方法设计。44名IAPT工作者完成了一项定量调查,其中测量了压力患病率(GHQ-12)和处置性应对方式(COPE)。对6名工作人员进行了定性访谈,并使用专题分析进行了分析。结果:近30%的IAPT工作人员达到轻度精神疾病标准。确定的压力源包括高容量和目标导向的工作、不断变化、资源问题、团队动态、高风险在职培训的需求、管理和控制压力和风险,以及家庭与工作的冲突。更多的接受和积极的应对方式与较低的压力有关,而关注和发泄情绪与较高的压力有关。结论:压力是IAPT员工的一个问题,新报道的压力源包括对目标的强调和高风险的在职培训。旨在促进接受和积极应对的干预措施可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effects of knowledge and word type on second language vocabulary learning: An exploratory study Do context and emotional reaction to physical dating violence interact to increase the likelihood of disclosure in 13 year-old British adolescents? Stress and Coping in IAPT Staff: a Mixed Methods Study Applying family life-cycle concepts in psychological practice with children and young people A different thing altogether: an idiographic case study of breast cancer in men using interpretative phenomenological analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1