Fundamental Analysis VS Technical analysis: The Comparison of Two Analysis in Malaysia Stock Market

Shaharudin Jakpar, Michael Tinggi, Akmal Hisham Tak, Wen Yi Chong
{"title":"Fundamental Analysis VS Technical analysis: The Comparison of Two Analysis in Malaysia Stock Market","authors":"Shaharudin Jakpar, Michael Tinggi, Akmal Hisham Tak, Wen Yi Chong","doi":"10.33736/URAF.1208.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is conducted to analyse the credibility of the fundamental analysis and technical analysis on predicting the stock return and compare both models to determine which model is more credible to be used as a good trading strategy by investors. The study is based on 80 companies selected from Bursa Malaysia in the food manufacturing industry in the main market from the year of 2012 to 2016. The stock return is used to measure whether both analyses are able to forecast and generate the positive return. Net profit margin, price earnings ratio and total asset turnover are used as fundamental indicators while moving average convergence divergence is used as technical analysis indicators. In order to test the significance of both model on stock return, panel regression models are applied in this study. The result shows that although both model can be used to generate positive return, technical analysis did not outperform fundamental analysis in the food manufacturing industry in Bursa Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":187805,"journal":{"name":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/URAF.1208.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study is conducted to analyse the credibility of the fundamental analysis and technical analysis on predicting the stock return and compare both models to determine which model is more credible to be used as a good trading strategy by investors. The study is based on 80 companies selected from Bursa Malaysia in the food manufacturing industry in the main market from the year of 2012 to 2016. The stock return is used to measure whether both analyses are able to forecast and generate the positive return. Net profit margin, price earnings ratio and total asset turnover are used as fundamental indicators while moving average convergence divergence is used as technical analysis indicators. In order to test the significance of both model on stock return, panel regression models are applied in this study. The result shows that although both model can be used to generate positive return, technical analysis did not outperform fundamental analysis in the food manufacturing industry in Bursa Malaysia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本分析与技术分析:两种分析在马来西亚股市的比较
本研究旨在分析基本面分析和技术分析在预测股票收益方面的可信度,并对两种模型进行比较,以确定哪种模型更可信,更适合投资者作为一种良好的交易策略。该研究基于从马来西亚证券交易所(Bursa Malaysia)选出的2012年至2016年主要市场食品制造业的80家公司。股票收益用于衡量两种分析是否能够预测并产生正收益。净利润率、市盈率和总资产周转率作为基本指标,移动平均收敛发散作为技术分析指标。为了检验两种模型对股票收益的显著性,本研究采用面板回归模型。结果表明,虽然这两个模型都可以用来产生正回报,技术分析并没有优于基本面分析在马来西亚证券交易所的食品制造业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AN INTERACTION BETWEEN BOARD ATTRIBUTES AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT OF LISTED MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN NIGERIA CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE AND COST OF EQUITY EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC LISTED COMPANIES IN MALAYSIA THE IMPACT OF TRADE, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI), AND ECONOMIC GROWTH ON CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) EMISSIONS IN SELECTED ASIAN COUNTRIES CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES ON BURSA MALAYSIA DIVIDEND POLICY EFFECTS ON FIRMS’ VALUE IN MALAYSIAN PLANTATION SECTOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1