Religion-Market Theory: A Qualitative Theory Testing

Nouha Khelfa
{"title":"Religion-Market Theory: A Qualitative Theory Testing","authors":"Nouha Khelfa","doi":"10.36256/ijrs.v5i1.295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite industrialization and modernization, religion still has a significant impact on society and politics. Many theories compete to answer questions about religion, yet this paper argues that religion-market theory has superiority in explaining the failure of secularization to diminish religion even in the most developed nations such as the United States, while it succeeded in others. Relying on Mill’s method of difference, this study qualitatively compares the two cases of the United States and the United Kingdom, relying on the history of religion and the economic structures of religious institutions. This study proves that Americans are far more religious than the British because since the foundation of the republic, the U.S. has not adopted any state religion while the UK has Christianity as the religion of the state since the English Reformation. Hence, religion-market theory that links between state’s regulations of religion and religiosity proves its superiority again.","PeriodicalId":444894,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v5i1.295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite industrialization and modernization, religion still has a significant impact on society and politics. Many theories compete to answer questions about religion, yet this paper argues that religion-market theory has superiority in explaining the failure of secularization to diminish religion even in the most developed nations such as the United States, while it succeeded in others. Relying on Mill’s method of difference, this study qualitatively compares the two cases of the United States and the United Kingdom, relying on the history of religion and the economic structures of religious institutions. This study proves that Americans are far more religious than the British because since the foundation of the republic, the U.S. has not adopted any state religion while the UK has Christianity as the religion of the state since the English Reformation. Hence, religion-market theory that links between state’s regulations of religion and religiosity proves its superiority again.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教-市场理论:一个定性的理论检验
尽管工业化和现代化,宗教仍然对社会和政治产生重大影响。许多理论竞相回答有关宗教的问题,但本文认为,宗教市场理论在解释世俗化未能减少宗教方面具有优势,即使在美国等最发达的国家也是如此,而在其他国家则取得了成功。本研究依托密尔的差异法,依托宗教史和宗教机构的经济结构,对美国和英国的两个案例进行定性比较。这一研究证明,美国人的宗教性远高于英国人,因为美国自建国以来就没有采用任何国教,而英国自英国宗教改革以来就将基督教作为国教。因此,将国家对宗教的管制与宗教性联系起来的宗教市场理论再次证明了它的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Drives Political Engagement of the Young Generation? A Political Psychology Study A Systematic Literature Review of Islamophobia on Media: Trends, Factors, and Stereotypes Religion-Market Theory: A Qualitative Theory Testing Tarian Kebalai Kematian Sebagai Ruang Publik Solidaritas Sosial Masyarakat Rote Ndao The Dynamic Role of Moslem in Building Indonesia as a Nation-State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1