User-perceived reusability estimation based on analysis of software repositories

Michail D. Papamichail, Themistoklis G. Diamantopoulos, Ilias Chrysovergis, Philippos Samlidis, A. Symeonidis
{"title":"User-perceived reusability estimation based on analysis of software repositories","authors":"Michail D. Papamichail, Themistoklis G. Diamantopoulos, Ilias Chrysovergis, Philippos Samlidis, A. Symeonidis","doi":"10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of open-source software repositories has led to a new reuse paradigm, where online resources can be thoroughly analyzed to identify reusable software components. Obviously, assessing the quality and specifically the reusability potential of source code residing in open software repositories poses a major challenge for the research community. Although several systems have been designed towards this direction, most of them do not focus on reusability. In this paper, we define and formulate a reusability score by employing information from GitHub stars and forks, which indicate the extent to which software components are adopted/accepted by developers. Our methodology involves applying and assessing different state-of-the-practice machine learning algorithms, in order to construct models for reusability estimation at both class and package levels. Preliminary evaluation of our methodology indicates that our approach can successfully assess reusability, as perceived by developers.","PeriodicalId":345739,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The popularity of open-source software repositories has led to a new reuse paradigm, where online resources can be thoroughly analyzed to identify reusable software components. Obviously, assessing the quality and specifically the reusability potential of source code residing in open software repositories poses a major challenge for the research community. Although several systems have been designed towards this direction, most of them do not focus on reusability. In this paper, we define and formulate a reusability score by employing information from GitHub stars and forks, which indicate the extent to which software components are adopted/accepted by developers. Our methodology involves applying and assessing different state-of-the-practice machine learning algorithms, in order to construct models for reusability estimation at both class and package levels. Preliminary evaluation of our methodology indicates that our approach can successfully assess reusability, as perceived by developers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于软件存储库分析的用户感知的可重用性评估
开源软件存储库的流行导致了一种新的重用范例,可以对在线资源进行彻底分析,以确定可重用的软件组件。显然,评估开放软件存储库中源代码的质量,特别是可重用性潜力,对研究社区来说是一个重大挑战。虽然有几个系统已经朝着这个方向设计,但它们中的大多数并不关注可重用性。在本文中,我们通过使用来自GitHub stars和forks的信息来定义和制定可重用性评分,这表明了软件组件被开发人员采用/接受的程度。我们的方法包括应用和评估不同的最先进的机器学习算法,以便在类和包级别构建可重用性评估模型。对我们方法的初步评估表明,我们的方法可以成功地评估可重用性,正如开发人员所感知的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensemble techniques for software change prediction: A preliminary investigation User-perceived reusability estimation based on analysis of software repositories The role of meta-learners in the adaptive selection of classifiers ConfigFile++: Automatic comment enhancement for misconfiguration prevention Varying defect prediction approaches during project evolution: A preliminary investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1