The role of meta-learners in the adaptive selection of classifiers

D. D. Nucci, A. D. Lucia
{"title":"The role of meta-learners in the adaptive selection of classifiers","authors":"D. D. Nucci, A. D. Lucia","doi":"10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of machine learning techniques able to classify source code components in defective or not received a lot of attention by the research community in the last decades. Previous studies indicated that no machine learning classifier is capable of providing the best accuracy in any context, highlighting interesting complementarity among them. For these reasons ensemble methods, that combines several classifier models, have been proposed. Among these, it was proposed ASCI (Adaptive Selection of Classifiers in bug predIction), an adaptive method able to dynamically select among a set of machine learning classifiers the one that better predicts the bug proneness of a class based on its characteristics. In summary, ASCI experiments each classifier on the training set and then use a meta-learner (e.g., Random Forest) to select the most suitable classifier to use for each test set instance. In this work, we conduct an empirical investigation on 21 open source software systems with the aim of analyzing the performance of several classifiers used as meta-learner in combination with ASCI. The results show that the selection of the meta-learner has not strong influence in the results achieved by ASCI in the context of within-project bug prediction. Indeed, the use of lightweight classifiers such as Naive Bayes or Logistic Regression is suggested.","PeriodicalId":345739,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of machine learning techniques able to classify source code components in defective or not received a lot of attention by the research community in the last decades. Previous studies indicated that no machine learning classifier is capable of providing the best accuracy in any context, highlighting interesting complementarity among them. For these reasons ensemble methods, that combines several classifier models, have been proposed. Among these, it was proposed ASCI (Adaptive Selection of Classifiers in bug predIction), an adaptive method able to dynamically select among a set of machine learning classifiers the one that better predicts the bug proneness of a class based on its characteristics. In summary, ASCI experiments each classifier on the training set and then use a meta-learner (e.g., Random Forest) to select the most suitable classifier to use for each test set instance. In this work, we conduct an empirical investigation on 21 open source software systems with the aim of analyzing the performance of several classifiers used as meta-learner in combination with ASCI. The results show that the selection of the meta-learner has not strong influence in the results achieved by ASCI in the context of within-project bug prediction. Indeed, the use of lightweight classifiers such as Naive Bayes or Logistic Regression is suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元学习者在分类器自适应选择中的作用
在过去的几十年里,使用机器学习技术对有缺陷或没有缺陷的源代码组件进行分类受到了研究界的广泛关注。先前的研究表明,没有机器学习分类器能够在任何上下文中提供最佳的准确性,突出了它们之间有趣的互补性。由于这些原因,集成方法,结合多个分类器模型,被提出。其中,提出了ASCI (Adaptive Selection of Classifiers in bug predIction),这是一种自适应方法,能够根据类的特征,在一组机器学习分类器中动态选择最能预测类的bug倾向的分类器。总之,ASCI在训练集上对每个分类器进行实验,然后使用元学习器(例如Random Forest)为每个测试集实例选择最合适的分类器。在这项工作中,我们对21个开源软件系统进行了实证调查,目的是分析与ASCI结合使用的几种分类器作为元学习器的性能。结果表明,元学习器的选择对ASCI在项目内bug预测中的结果影响不大。实际上,建议使用轻量级分类器,如朴素贝叶斯或逻辑回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensemble techniques for software change prediction: A preliminary investigation User-perceived reusability estimation based on analysis of software repositories The role of meta-learners in the adaptive selection of classifiers ConfigFile++: Automatic comment enhancement for misconfiguration prevention Varying defect prediction approaches during project evolution: A preliminary investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1