G. Poniatowski, Adam Śmietanka, M. Bonch-Osmolovskiy
{"title":"Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States: 2020 Final Report","authors":"G. Poniatowski, Adam Śmietanka, M. Bonch-Osmolovskiy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3744157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Study contains Value Added Tax (VAT) Gap estimates for 2018, fast estimates using a simplified methodology for 2019, the year immediately preceding the analysis, and includes revised estimates for 2014-2017. It also includes the updated and extended results of the econometric analysis of VAT Gap determinants initiated and initially reported in the 2018 Report (Poniatowski et al., 2018). As a novelty, the econometric analysis to forecast potential impacts of the coronavirus crisis and resulting recession on the evolution of the VAT Gap in 2020 is reported.In 2018, most European Union (EU) Member States (MS) saw a slight decrease in the pace of gross domestic product (GDP) growth, but the economic conditions for increasing tax compliance remained favourable. We estimate that the VAT total tax liability (VTTL) in 2018 increased by 3.6 percent whereas VAT revenue increased by 4.2 percent, leading to a decline in the VAT Gap in both relative and nominal terms. In relative terms, the EU-wide Gap dropped to 11 percent and EUR 140 billion. Fast estimates show that the VAT Gap will likely continue to decline in 2019.Of the EU-28, the smallest Gaps were observed in Sweden (0.7 percent), Croatia (3.5 percent), and Finland (3.6 percent), the largest – in Romania (33.8 percent), Greece (30.1 percent), and Lithuania (25.9 percent). Overall, half of the EU-28 MS recorded a Gap above 9.2 percent. In nominal terms, the largest Gaps were recorded in Italy (EUR 35.4 billion), the United Kingdom (EUR 23.5 billion), and Germany (EUR 22 billion).The Policy Gap and its components remained stable. For the EU overall, the average Policy Gap level was 44.24 percent. Of this, in 2018, 10.07 percentage points were due to the application of various reduced and super-reduced rates (the Rate Gap) and 34.17 were due to the application of exemptions without the right to deduct.The results of the econometric analysis show that the VAT Gap is influenced by a group of factors relating to the current economic conditions, institutional environment, and economic structure as well as to the measures and actions of tax administrations. Out of a broad set of tested variables, GDP growth and general government balance appeared to explain a substantial set of VAT Gap variation across time and countries. Within the control of tax administrations, share of IT expenditure proved to have the highest statistical significance in explaining the size of the VAT Gap. In addition, the VAT Gap appeared to be inter-related with the values of risky imports of goods, indicating the role of fraud in driving the overall share of the VAT Gap.Since the COVID-19 recession will likely have a dire impact on the EU economies, the VAT Gap in 2020 is forecasted to increase. If the EU economy contracts by 7.4 percent in 2020 and the general government deficit jumps as forecasted in the Spring Forecast of the European Commission, the Gap could increase by 4.1 percentage points year-over year up to 13.7 percent and EUR 164 billion in 2020. The hike in 2020 could be more pronounced than the gradual decrease of the Gap observed over the three preceding years. Moreover, a return to the VAT Gap levels observed in 2018 and 2019 will take time and require significant action from tax administrations.This Report has been written for the European Commission, DG TAXUD, for the project TAXUD/2019/AO-14, “Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States”, and is a follow-up to the seven reports published between 2013 and 2019.","PeriodicalId":175661,"journal":{"name":"CASE - Center for Social & Economic Research Paper Series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CASE - Center for Social & Economic Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
This Study contains Value Added Tax (VAT) Gap estimates for 2018, fast estimates using a simplified methodology for 2019, the year immediately preceding the analysis, and includes revised estimates for 2014-2017. It also includes the updated and extended results of the econometric analysis of VAT Gap determinants initiated and initially reported in the 2018 Report (Poniatowski et al., 2018). As a novelty, the econometric analysis to forecast potential impacts of the coronavirus crisis and resulting recession on the evolution of the VAT Gap in 2020 is reported.In 2018, most European Union (EU) Member States (MS) saw a slight decrease in the pace of gross domestic product (GDP) growth, but the economic conditions for increasing tax compliance remained favourable. We estimate that the VAT total tax liability (VTTL) in 2018 increased by 3.6 percent whereas VAT revenue increased by 4.2 percent, leading to a decline in the VAT Gap in both relative and nominal terms. In relative terms, the EU-wide Gap dropped to 11 percent and EUR 140 billion. Fast estimates show that the VAT Gap will likely continue to decline in 2019.Of the EU-28, the smallest Gaps were observed in Sweden (0.7 percent), Croatia (3.5 percent), and Finland (3.6 percent), the largest – in Romania (33.8 percent), Greece (30.1 percent), and Lithuania (25.9 percent). Overall, half of the EU-28 MS recorded a Gap above 9.2 percent. In nominal terms, the largest Gaps were recorded in Italy (EUR 35.4 billion), the United Kingdom (EUR 23.5 billion), and Germany (EUR 22 billion).The Policy Gap and its components remained stable. For the EU overall, the average Policy Gap level was 44.24 percent. Of this, in 2018, 10.07 percentage points were due to the application of various reduced and super-reduced rates (the Rate Gap) and 34.17 were due to the application of exemptions without the right to deduct.The results of the econometric analysis show that the VAT Gap is influenced by a group of factors relating to the current economic conditions, institutional environment, and economic structure as well as to the measures and actions of tax administrations. Out of a broad set of tested variables, GDP growth and general government balance appeared to explain a substantial set of VAT Gap variation across time and countries. Within the control of tax administrations, share of IT expenditure proved to have the highest statistical significance in explaining the size of the VAT Gap. In addition, the VAT Gap appeared to be inter-related with the values of risky imports of goods, indicating the role of fraud in driving the overall share of the VAT Gap.Since the COVID-19 recession will likely have a dire impact on the EU economies, the VAT Gap in 2020 is forecasted to increase. If the EU economy contracts by 7.4 percent in 2020 and the general government deficit jumps as forecasted in the Spring Forecast of the European Commission, the Gap could increase by 4.1 percentage points year-over year up to 13.7 percent and EUR 164 billion in 2020. The hike in 2020 could be more pronounced than the gradual decrease of the Gap observed over the three preceding years. Moreover, a return to the VAT Gap levels observed in 2018 and 2019 will take time and require significant action from tax administrations.This Report has been written for the European Commission, DG TAXUD, for the project TAXUD/2019/AO-14, “Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States”, and is a follow-up to the seven reports published between 2013 and 2019.
本研究包含2018年增值税缺口估算、分析前一年2019年使用简化方法的快速估算,以及2014-2017年的修订估算。它还包括2018年报告中发起和最初报告的增值税差距决定因素计量经济学分析的更新和扩展结果(Poniatowski et al., 2018)。报道了一项新颖的计量经济学分析,以预测冠状病毒危机及其导致的经济衰退对2020年增值税差距演变的潜在影响。2018年,大多数欧盟成员国的国内生产总值(GDP)增长速度略有下降,但提高税收合规性的经济条件仍然有利。我们估计,2018年增值税总应纳税义务(VTTL)增长3.6%,而增值税收入增长4.2%,导致增值税差距在相对和名义上都有所缩小。相对而言,欧盟范围内的差距下降到11%和1400亿欧元。快速估计显示,2019年增值税差距可能会继续缩小。在欧盟28国中,差距最小的是瑞典(0.7%)、克罗地亚(3.5%)和芬兰(3.6%),差距最大的是罗马尼亚(33.8%)、希腊(30.1%)和立陶宛(25.9%)。总体而言,欧盟28个成员国中有一半的差距超过9.2%。按名义价值计算,缺口最大的是意大利(354亿欧元)、英国(235亿欧元)和德国(220亿欧元)。政策缺口及其组成部分保持稳定。就欧盟整体而言,平均政策差距水平为44.24%。其中,在2018年,10.07个百分点是由于适用各种降低和超降低的税率(税率差距),34.17个百分点是由于适用无抵扣权的豁免。计量经济学分析的结果表明,增值税差距受到与当前经济状况、制度环境、经济结构以及税收管理措施和行动有关的一系列因素的影响。在一系列广泛的测试变量中,GDP增长和一般政府平衡似乎可以解释不同时间和国家的增值税差距变化。在税务管理部门的控制下,信息技术支出的份额被证明在解释增值税差距的大小方面具有最高的统计意义。此外,增值税缺口似乎与风险进口商品的价值相互关联,表明欺诈在推动增值税缺口的总体份额方面所起的作用。由于新冠肺炎经济衰退可能会对欧盟经济产生严重影响,预计2020年增值税缺口将扩大。如果2020年欧盟经济萎缩7.4%,而政府总体赤字如欧盟委员会春季预测所预测的那样大幅增加,那么到2020年,缺口可能会同比增加4.1个百分点,达到13.7%,达到1640亿欧元。2020年的加息可能比前三年观察到的差距逐渐缩小更为明显。此外,要恢复到2018年和2019年观察到的增值税差距水平需要时间,并需要税务部门采取重大行动。本报告是为欧盟委员会(DG TAXUD)为TAXUD/2019/AO-14项目“欧盟28个成员国增值税差距的研究和报告”撰写的,是2013年至2019年期间发布的七份报告的后续报告。