A study on the relationship between cosmology of Taijitushuo and Zhu Xi's ‘Li-buntilun’

Jung-kak Kim
{"title":"A study on the relationship between cosmology of Taijitushuo and Zhu Xi's ‘Li-buntilun’","authors":"Jung-kak Kim","doi":"10.19065/japk.2022.12.58.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern and contemporary scholars generally evaluate Zhoud-unyi's theory as cosmology. However, there is a difference in the specific content. As a representative example, Zhubokun defines Zhoudunyi's study as 'cosmogeny' based on Taijitushuo. Mozong-nsan defines Zhoudunyi's study as 'becoming' based on Tongshuo. \n‘Cosmology’ originates from ‘Kosmos’ originally proposed by Pythagoras. Pythagoras interprets ‘Kosmos’ as ‘Universe’ and also presents the ‘form’ of ‘number’ as the cause of such a universe. And this ‘form’ defines ‘matter’ and the universe is created. In this way, in the cosmology established by ‘matter’, ‘form’ and ‘dualistic world view’, ‘cosmogeny’ and ‘becoming’ are not particularly distinguished, and fact and value are separated. \nHowever, in the cosmology of Yi-ology, facts and values are continuous. The cosmology of Yi-ology is based on agricultural culture which is why it is 'becoming', and at the same time, its internal causes and principles have an ethical character. This is expressed as the law of ‘yiyinyiyang(一陰一陽)’. In this way, the philosophical meaning of cosmology, which can be confirmed in Yizhuan, is a continuation of facts and values, which leads to the thought of ‘the unity of heaven and human(天人合一)’. \nTaijitushuo has the character of 'becoming' but also the charac-ter of 'cosmogeny'. However, the theory of spontaneous generation by the movement of ‘Yuanqi(元氣)’ itself in Taijitushuo as supported by Zhu Xi has limitations in terms morality and of ethics. It is that in the process of cosmogony, the moral nature or essence by confucianism cannot be dealt with. If so, the theory of cosmogeny in Taijitushuo will be reduced to non-essentialism or a search for facts. \nZhu Xi is solving these problems through 'Li-bunti(理本體)'. In other words, by setting up a transcendental and conceptual space, the principle of ‘yiyinyiyang(一陰一陽)’ can always function as a natural law and a normative law throughout the entire process of ‘Qihua(氣化)’. If so, Taijitushuo's theory of cosmogeny means value and practical discussion, and also means ‘the unity of heaven and human(天人合一)’. Based on this, Zhu Xi's 'Li-buntilun(理本體論)' does not oppose cosmology, but rather supplements it.","PeriodicalId":297075,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19065/japk.2022.12.58.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern and contemporary scholars generally evaluate Zhoud-unyi's theory as cosmology. However, there is a difference in the specific content. As a representative example, Zhubokun defines Zhoudunyi's study as 'cosmogeny' based on Taijitushuo. Mozong-nsan defines Zhoudunyi's study as 'becoming' based on Tongshuo. ‘Cosmology’ originates from ‘Kosmos’ originally proposed by Pythagoras. Pythagoras interprets ‘Kosmos’ as ‘Universe’ and also presents the ‘form’ of ‘number’ as the cause of such a universe. And this ‘form’ defines ‘matter’ and the universe is created. In this way, in the cosmology established by ‘matter’, ‘form’ and ‘dualistic world view’, ‘cosmogeny’ and ‘becoming’ are not particularly distinguished, and fact and value are separated. However, in the cosmology of Yi-ology, facts and values are continuous. The cosmology of Yi-ology is based on agricultural culture which is why it is 'becoming', and at the same time, its internal causes and principles have an ethical character. This is expressed as the law of ‘yiyinyiyang(一陰一陽)’. In this way, the philosophical meaning of cosmology, which can be confirmed in Yizhuan, is a continuation of facts and values, which leads to the thought of ‘the unity of heaven and human(天人合一)’. Taijitushuo has the character of 'becoming' but also the charac-ter of 'cosmogeny'. However, the theory of spontaneous generation by the movement of ‘Yuanqi(元氣)’ itself in Taijitushuo as supported by Zhu Xi has limitations in terms morality and of ethics. It is that in the process of cosmogony, the moral nature or essence by confucianism cannot be dealt with. If so, the theory of cosmogeny in Taijitushuo will be reduced to non-essentialism or a search for facts. Zhu Xi is solving these problems through 'Li-bunti(理本體)'. In other words, by setting up a transcendental and conceptual space, the principle of ‘yiyinyiyang(一陰一陽)’ can always function as a natural law and a normative law throughout the entire process of ‘Qihua(氣化)’. If so, Taijitushuo's theory of cosmogeny means value and practical discussion, and also means ‘the unity of heaven and human(天人合一)’. Based on this, Zhu Xi's 'Li-buntilun(理本體論)' does not oppose cosmology, but rather supplements it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《太极图说》宇宙观与朱熹《李秉纲论》关系研究
现当代学者普遍把周舜颐的学说评价为宇宙论。但是,在具体内容上是有区别的。朱伯坤将周敦颐的研究定义为以《太极图》为基础的“宇宙学”。禅宗将《周敦颐》的研究定义为以《通说》为基础的“成”。“宇宙学”起源于毕达哥拉斯最初提出的“宇宙”。毕达哥拉斯将“宇宙”解释为“宇宙”,并提出“数”的“形式”作为这样一个宇宙的原因。这种“形式”定义了“物质”,宇宙由此诞生。这样,在由“物质”、“形式”和“二元世界观”所建立的宇宙论中,“宇宙发生”和“形成”并没有特别的区别,事实和价值是分开的。然而,在易学的宇宙观中,事实和价值是连续的。易学的宇宙观是建立在农业文化的基础上的,这是易学“成”的原因,同时,易学的内在原因和原理也具有伦理性。这就是“一阴一阳”的规律。这样,《易传》所确认的宇宙论的哲学意义是事实和价值的延续,从而产生了“天人合一”的思想。太极图既有“生成”的特征,又有“宇宙发生”的特征。然而,朱熹所支持的《太极图》本身的“元气自发说”在道德和伦理方面存在局限性。而是在宇宙演化的过程中,无法处理儒家的道德本质。这样的话,《太极图》的宇宙发生论就会沦为非本质论或求实论。朱熹通过“Li-bunti”解决了这些问题。换句话说,通过建立一个先验的概念空间,“一阴一阳”原则始终可以作为贯穿整个“齐化”过程的自然规律和规范规律发挥作用。如果是这样的话,那么《太极图》的宇宙论就意味着价值和实践的探讨,也意味着“天人合一”。在此基础上,朱熹的《概论》不是反对宇宙论,而是补充宇宙论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concerning the Distinction between Xing and Ming in Mengzi 7B24 Focusing on Zhu Xi's Two Interpretations Disgust as seen through Lao-tzu’s Thought: Focusing on the Correlative Thinking of the Dao A Study on the Learning and Practice of Songdang Park Yeong and the Criticism of Junior Scholars Evaluations of Joseon Confucian Scholars on Shen Gui-bao’s Concept of Intelligence and Jeong Jae-gyu’s Understanding of it Hangang School’s Research Status, Achievements and Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1