Toward a framework for the natures of proportional reasoning in introductory physics

A. Boudreaux, S. Kanim, Alexis Olsho, S. Brahmia, Charlotte Zimmerman, Trevor I. Smith
{"title":"Toward a framework for the natures of proportional reasoning in introductory physics","authors":"A. Boudreaux, S. Kanim, Alexis Olsho, S. Brahmia, Charlotte Zimmerman, Trevor I. Smith","doi":"10.1119/perc.2020.pr.boudreaux","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a set of modes of reasoning about ratio and proportion as a means of operationalizing expert practice in physics. These modes, or natures of proportional reasoning, stem from consideration of how physicists reason in context and are informed by prior work in physics and mathematics education. We frame the natures as the core of an emerging framework for proportional reasoning in introductory physics, that will categorize the uses of proportional reasoning in introductory physics contexts, and provide guidance for the development of reliable assessments. We share results from preliminary assessment items indicating that university physics students have difficulty interpreting and applying ratios in context.","PeriodicalId":269466,"journal":{"name":"2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.boudreaux","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We present a set of modes of reasoning about ratio and proportion as a means of operationalizing expert practice in physics. These modes, or natures of proportional reasoning, stem from consideration of how physicists reason in context and are informed by prior work in physics and mathematics education. We frame the natures as the core of an emerging framework for proportional reasoning in introductory physics, that will categorize the uses of proportional reasoning in introductory physics contexts, and provide guidance for the development of reliable assessments. We share results from preliminary assessment items indicating that university physics students have difficulty interpreting and applying ratios in context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍物理学中比例推理本质的框架
我们提出了一套关于比率和比例的推理模式,作为物理专家实践的操作手段。这些模式,或比例推理的性质,源于物理学家如何在上下文中进行推理的考虑,并受到先前物理和数学教育工作的影响。我们将这些性质作为介绍性物理中比例推理的新兴框架的核心,该框架将对介绍性物理环境中比例推理的使用进行分类,并为可靠评估的发展提供指导。我们分享了初步评估项目的结果,表明大学物理系学生在语境中难以解释和应用比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graduate programs in physics education research: A USA based survey Qualitative Analysis of Students' Epistemic Framing Surrounding Instructor's Interaction Centering and marginalization in introductory university physics courses Toward a framework for the natures of proportional reasoning in introductory physics What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1