Repeated Interactions vs. Social Ties: Quantifying the Economic Value of Trust, Forgiveness, and Reputation Using a Field Experiment

R. Bapna, Liangfei Qiu, Sarah C. Rice
{"title":"Repeated Interactions vs. Social Ties: Quantifying the Economic Value of Trust, Forgiveness, and Reputation Using a Field Experiment","authors":"R. Bapna, Liangfei Qiu, Sarah C. Rice","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2506203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing importance of online social networks provides fertile ground for researchers seeking to gain a deeper understanding of fundamental constructs of human behavior, such as trust, forgiveness, and their linkage to social ties. Through a field experiment that uses data from the Facebook API to measure social ties that connect our subjects, we separate forward-looking instrumental trust from static intrinsic trust and show that the level of instrumental trust and forgiveness, and the effect of forgiveness on deterring future defections, crucially depend on the strength of social ties. We find that the level of trust under social repeated play is greater than the level of trust under anonymous repeated play, which in turn is greater than the level of trust under anonymous one shot games. We also uncover forgiveness as a key mechanism that facilitates the cooperative equilibrium being more stable in the presence of social ties: If the trading partners are socially connected, the equilibrium is more likely to return to the original cooperative one after small disturbances.","PeriodicalId":125760,"journal":{"name":"Texas A&M University Mays Business School Research Paper Series","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas A&M University Mays Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The growing importance of online social networks provides fertile ground for researchers seeking to gain a deeper understanding of fundamental constructs of human behavior, such as trust, forgiveness, and their linkage to social ties. Through a field experiment that uses data from the Facebook API to measure social ties that connect our subjects, we separate forward-looking instrumental trust from static intrinsic trust and show that the level of instrumental trust and forgiveness, and the effect of forgiveness on deterring future defections, crucially depend on the strength of social ties. We find that the level of trust under social repeated play is greater than the level of trust under anonymous repeated play, which in turn is greater than the level of trust under anonymous one shot games. We also uncover forgiveness as a key mechanism that facilitates the cooperative equilibrium being more stable in the presence of social ties: If the trading partners are socially connected, the equilibrium is more likely to return to the original cooperative one after small disturbances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复互动vs.社会关系:使用实地实验量化信任、宽恕和声誉的经济价值
越来越重要的在线社交网络为研究人员提供了肥沃的土壤,这些研究人员试图更深入地了解人类行为的基本结构,如信任、宽恕及其与社会关系的联系。通过使用Facebook API的数据来测量连接我们研究对象的社会关系的现场实验,我们将前瞻性的工具性信任与静态的内在信任分开,并表明工具性信任和宽恕的水平,以及宽恕对阻止未来背叛的影响,在很大程度上取决于社会关系的强度。我们发现,社会重复游戏下的信任水平大于匿名重复游戏下的信任水平,而匿名重复游戏下的信任水平又大于匿名一次游戏下的信任水平。我们还发现,在存在社会联系的情况下,宽恕是促进合作均衡更加稳定的关键机制:如果贸易伙伴是社会联系的,那么在小的干扰之后,平衡更有可能回到最初的合作均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Interest and Inflation Rates Repeated Interactions vs. Social Ties: Quantifying the Economic Value of Trust, Forgiveness, and Reputation Using a Field Experiment The Effects of B2B Service Innovations on Firm Value and Firm Risk: How Do They Differ from Those of B2C Service Innovations? Arachnophobia: A Case on Impairment and Accounting Ethics Abnormal Trading Around Common Factor Pricing Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1