An Analysis of Quantitative Aspects in the Evaluation of Thematic Segmentation Algorithms

Maria Georgescul, Alexander Clark, S. Armstrong
{"title":"An Analysis of Quantitative Aspects in the Evaluation of Thematic Segmentation Algorithms","authors":"Maria Georgescul, Alexander Clark, S. Armstrong","doi":"10.3115/1654595.1654622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider here the task of linear the-matic segmentation of text documents, by using features based on word distributions in the text. For this task, a typical and often implicit assumption in previous studies is that a document has just one topic and therefore many algorithms have been tested and have shown encouraging results on artificial data sets, generated by putting together parts of different documents. We show that evaluation on synthetic data is potentially misleading and fails to give an accurate evaluation of the performance on real data. Moreover, we provide a critical review of existing evaluation metrics in the literature and we propose an improved evaluation metric.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1654595.1654622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

We consider here the task of linear the-matic segmentation of text documents, by using features based on word distributions in the text. For this task, a typical and often implicit assumption in previous studies is that a document has just one topic and therefore many algorithms have been tested and have shown encouraging results on artificial data sets, generated by putting together parts of different documents. We show that evaluation on synthetic data is potentially misleading and fails to give an accurate evaluation of the performance on real data. Moreover, we provide a critical review of existing evaluation metrics in the literature and we propose an improved evaluation metric.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主题分割算法评价中的定量分析
我们在这里考虑使用基于文本中单词分布的特征对文本文档进行线性自动分割的任务。对于这项任务,以前的研究中一个典型且通常隐含的假设是,一个文档只有一个主题,因此已经测试了许多算法,并在人工数据集上显示了令人鼓舞的结果,这些数据集是通过将不同文档的部分放在一起生成的。我们表明,对合成数据的评价具有潜在的误导性,并且无法对真实数据的性能给出准确的评价。此外,我们对文献中现有的评估指标进行了批判性的回顾,并提出了一种改进的评估指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1