Comparison of efficacy between face-to-face and online consultation against overweight and obesity

Jessica Rubí Molina Tellez, D. Incontri-Abraham, J. A. Almeyda-Farfán, Antonio Ibarra
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy between face-to-face and online consultation against overweight and obesity","authors":"Jessica Rubí Molina Tellez, D. Incontri-Abraham, J. A. Almeyda-Farfán, Antonio Ibarra","doi":"10.36105/psrua.2023v3n5.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Overweight and obesity have progressively increased in recent years. Online consultation has become a useful tool for healthcare professionals and patients that cannot be assisted through face-to-face consultation. Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the efficacy between online and face-to-face consultation as a strategy in the management of overweight and obesity. Material and Methods: An experimental, cross-sectional study was carried out in 88 patients between 25-30 years old. Patients were classified into two groups of 44 individuals: online and face-to-face consultation.  Nutritional evaluations were conducted in each consultation, which comprised of anthropometric, dietetic, and physical assessments. The therapy consisted of individually designed menus made by a specialist and other recommendations based on the World Health Association (WHO) guidelines.  Results: Most patients in both groups achieved normal anthropometric measurements after the intervention (41/44 face-to-face group; 39/44 online group). Intragroup analysis (before and after intervention) of body mass index (BMI), weight, and fat percentage in both groups revealed a significant improvement after the intervention (p<0.0001). Intergroup analysis of BMI (p<0.4031), weight (p<0.2265), and fat percentage (p<0.3872) showed no significant difference. The analysis of efficacy revealed an efficacy of up to 95% in the online consultation group when compared to the face-to-face consultation one. Conclusions: No significant difference was found between online and face-to-face groups. The efficacy of online consultation was 95%. These results allow us to conclude that online and face-to-face consultation have a similar efficacy.","PeriodicalId":125514,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Scientific Research Universidad Anáhuac. Multidisciplinary Journal of Healthcare","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Scientific Research Universidad Anáhuac. Multidisciplinary Journal of Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36105/psrua.2023v3n5.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Overweight and obesity have progressively increased in recent years. Online consultation has become a useful tool for healthcare professionals and patients that cannot be assisted through face-to-face consultation. Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the efficacy between online and face-to-face consultation as a strategy in the management of overweight and obesity. Material and Methods: An experimental, cross-sectional study was carried out in 88 patients between 25-30 years old. Patients were classified into two groups of 44 individuals: online and face-to-face consultation.  Nutritional evaluations were conducted in each consultation, which comprised of anthropometric, dietetic, and physical assessments. The therapy consisted of individually designed menus made by a specialist and other recommendations based on the World Health Association (WHO) guidelines.  Results: Most patients in both groups achieved normal anthropometric measurements after the intervention (41/44 face-to-face group; 39/44 online group). Intragroup analysis (before and after intervention) of body mass index (BMI), weight, and fat percentage in both groups revealed a significant improvement after the intervention (p<0.0001). Intergroup analysis of BMI (p<0.4031), weight (p<0.2265), and fat percentage (p<0.3872) showed no significant difference. The analysis of efficacy revealed an efficacy of up to 95% in the online consultation group when compared to the face-to-face consultation one. Conclusions: No significant difference was found between online and face-to-face groups. The efficacy of online consultation was 95%. These results allow us to conclude that online and face-to-face consultation have a similar efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对面和在线咨询对抗超重和肥胖的效果比较
近年来,超重和肥胖逐渐增加。对于无法通过面对面咨询获得帮助的医疗保健专业人员和患者来说,在线咨询已成为一种有用的工具。目的:我们的研究旨在比较在线咨询和面对面咨询作为超重和肥胖管理策略的疗效。材料与方法:对88例年龄在25-30岁之间的患者进行了一项实验性横断面研究。患者被分为两组,每组44人:在线咨询和面对面咨询。在每次咨询中进行营养评估,包括人体测量、饮食和身体评估。该疗法包括由专家单独设计的菜单和根据世界卫生协会(世卫组织)准则提出的其他建议。结果:干预后,两组患者均达到正常的人体测量值(41/44面对面组;39/44在线组)。组内分析(干预前后)两组体重指数(BMI)、体重、脂肪率均有显著改善(p<0.0001)。BMI (p<0.4031)、体重(p<0.2265)、脂肪率(p<0.3872)组间分析差异无统计学意义。疗效分析显示,与面对面咨询组相比,在线咨询组的疗效高达95%。结论:在线组与面对面组之间无显著差异。在线咨询的有效率为95%。这些结果使我们得出结论,在线咨询和面对面咨询具有相似的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of efficacy between face-to-face and online consultation against overweight and obesity Viral hepatitis, hallmarks and molecular features The role of dupilumab in diverse allergic pathologies Anatomical zone where more injuries occur in four different dance styles: Hip-Hop, Classical Ballet, Contemporary dance and Irish dancing: a systematic review AIDS-related disseminated Kaposi Sarcoma: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1