Can the Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome Crisis Contribute to Challenging Contemporary Discourses Against Abortion Legalization in Brazil?

Daniel Rosendo, T. Gonçalves
{"title":"Can the Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome Crisis Contribute to Challenging Contemporary Discourses Against Abortion Legalization in Brazil?","authors":"Daniel Rosendo, T. Gonçalves","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2018V17N2P291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we will explore the widespread of congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil associated with abyssal social inequalities as a trigger to push for abortion legalization, from a human rights perspective. Brazil has a very restrictive regulation on abortion, which allows the procedure only when the life of the mother is in danger, in cases of sexual violence and when the fetus suffers from anencephaly. Due to the growing influence of ultra-conservative forces in the Parliament the legislative debate on abortion has been blocked for many years in Brazil, making social movements seek the courts for advancements in this area. In this paper, we will present general data on the Zika epidemic, social inequalities and unequal access to health services as a background for the discussion on advancing abortion legalization in the country through judicial procedures, from a human rights perspective.","PeriodicalId":104826,"journal":{"name":"ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy","volume":"515 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2018V17N2P291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we will explore the widespread of congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil associated with abyssal social inequalities as a trigger to push for abortion legalization, from a human rights perspective. Brazil has a very restrictive regulation on abortion, which allows the procedure only when the life of the mother is in danger, in cases of sexual violence and when the fetus suffers from anencephaly. Due to the growing influence of ultra-conservative forces in the Parliament the legislative debate on abortion has been blocked for many years in Brazil, making social movements seek the courts for advancements in this area. In this paper, we will present general data on the Zika epidemic, social inequalities and unequal access to health services as a background for the discussion on advancing abortion legalization in the country through judicial procedures, from a human rights perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天寨卡病毒综合症危机是否有助于挑战巴西当代反对堕胎合法化的话语?
在本文中,我们将从人权的角度探讨先天性寨卡病毒综合征在巴西的广泛传播与严重的社会不平等有关,作为推动堕胎合法化的触发因素。巴西对堕胎有非常严格的规定,只有在母亲的生命处于危险之中、发生性暴力以及胎儿患有无脑畸形的情况下,才允许进行堕胎。由于议会中极端保守势力的影响越来越大,关于堕胎的立法辩论在巴西已被阻止多年,使得社会运动寻求法院在这一领域取得进展。在本文中,我们将从人权的角度,提供关于寨卡疫情、社会不平等和获得医疗服务不平等的一般数据,作为讨论通过司法程序推进该国堕胎合法化的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Respeitando biografias até o fim: uma concepção de personalidade mais adequada ao cuidado centrado na pessoa de indivíduos com transtornos graves da consciência Neurociência cognitiva e epistemologia moral: sobre a irredutibilidade do saber ao conhecimento A tradição filosófica e o paradoxo do fim do sujeito Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law Indigenous Environmental Interests and their Connection to Anthropogenic Climate Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1