Evaluation of Practice Teachers’ Views on Inclusive Education

Charlene Faye A. Agati, Dennis G. Caballes
{"title":"Evaluation of Practice Teachers’ Views on Inclusive Education","authors":"Charlene Faye A. Agati, Dennis G. Caballes","doi":"10.22161/jhed.5.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the views of practice teachers toward the inclusion of students with special education needs in the regular classroom. A total of 32 practice teachers from University of the East, College of Education, participated in the research. Mixed-Method was utilized which comprised of participants answering a questionnaire and participating in a focus group discussion. The questionnaire, My Thinking about Inclusion Scale, MTAI, (Stoiber et al., 1998) was utilized for the quantitative part of the research; while, a focus group discussion was conducted for the qualitative part which sought to uncover the perceptions of practice teachers concerning their background and training on inclusive education. Only six of the 32 practice teachers were able to join the focus group discussion. The results revealed that there is no significant difference in the practice teachers’ views on inclusive education between males and females and their degree programs. Findings also showed that practice teachers held similar positive views on inclusion. The responses of the participants in the focus group discussion unveiled that the practice teachers believed they have adequate theoretical knowledge about inclusive education; however, they still require further in-depth training and hands-on involvement and participation in conducting inclusive practices inside classrooms to effectively apply them in the future as they become licensed teachers. They also saw the importance of the support of the government and the cooperation of schools as well as parents and guardians for the successful espousal of inclusive education.","PeriodicalId":415377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Education Development","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Education Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.5.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the views of practice teachers toward the inclusion of students with special education needs in the regular classroom. A total of 32 practice teachers from University of the East, College of Education, participated in the research. Mixed-Method was utilized which comprised of participants answering a questionnaire and participating in a focus group discussion. The questionnaire, My Thinking about Inclusion Scale, MTAI, (Stoiber et al., 1998) was utilized for the quantitative part of the research; while, a focus group discussion was conducted for the qualitative part which sought to uncover the perceptions of practice teachers concerning their background and training on inclusive education. Only six of the 32 practice teachers were able to join the focus group discussion. The results revealed that there is no significant difference in the practice teachers’ views on inclusive education between males and females and their degree programs. Findings also showed that practice teachers held similar positive views on inclusion. The responses of the participants in the focus group discussion unveiled that the practice teachers believed they have adequate theoretical knowledge about inclusive education; however, they still require further in-depth training and hands-on involvement and participation in conducting inclusive practices inside classrooms to effectively apply them in the future as they become licensed teachers. They also saw the importance of the support of the government and the cooperation of schools as well as parents and guardians for the successful espousal of inclusive education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践教师全纳教育观评价
本研究考察了实习教师对将有特殊教育需要的学生纳入普通课堂的看法。来自东方大学教育学院的32名实习教师参与了本研究。采用混合方法,其中包括参与者回答问卷和参加焦点小组讨论。定量部分采用问卷《My Thinking about Inclusion Scale, MTAI》(Stoiber et al., 1998);同时,对定性部分进行了焦点小组讨论,旨在揭示实践教师对其背景和全纳教育培训的看法。32位实践教师中只有6位能够参加焦点小组讨论。结果发现,实习教师对全纳教育的看法在不同学历、不同性别之间均无显著差异。调查结果还显示,实习教师对包容性持类似的积极看法。焦点小组讨论参与者的反馈显示,实践教师认为自己对全纳教育有足够的理论知识;然而,他们仍然需要进一步的深入培训和实际参与,在课堂内开展包容性实践,以便在未来成为有执照的教师时有效地应用这些实践。他们还看到了政府的支持和学校以及家长和监护人的合作对于成功推行全纳教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alice in Wonderland: A Mythical Journey Projected transformations to improve the management of the accounting process at the University of Havana Improvement Strategy in Virtual Education. An experience from Cuba Civil society and COVID-19 pandemic in Nagaland: Response in a Democratic Society Humanism in Norman Mailer's War Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1