Müzikal Minimalizm: Bir Yanıltıcı Ad Mı?

Orhan Torun
{"title":"Müzikal Minimalizm: Bir Yanıltıcı Ad Mı?","authors":"Orhan Torun","doi":"10.59446/porteakademik.1292776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether the term ‘minimal’ is appropriate for the music to which it refers to has been a subject of debate among scholars and composers. Many alternative terms were suggested as substitutions or complements. Consequently, the extent to which minimalist music is minimal has been discussed. Most of the previous studies on the distinctive qualities of minimal music and whether the term is misleading provided either a discussion of the alternative terminology or a comparison of minimal art and music; on the other hand, this essay aims to investigate the ways in which minimal music is ‘minimal’ with a broader view from the perspectives of different disciplines, which is necessary.\nFirst, previous studies on understanding why such music and art are considered ‘minimal’ are reviewed and compared. To establish a broader perspective for accuracy, the focus is not limited to the period between the 1960s and 1980s, when minimalist music appeared, developed, and flourished. Sociocultural dynamics surrounding this art and music are also considered since they reflect in the surface qualities of the works; hence a two-way relationship. However, the related sociocultural aspects are only briefly mentioned since they are not in the main scope of this study. Second, the first known publication in which the term is used in a distinctive musical context is presented and discussed in addition to the other starting points suggested by scholars; moreover, the spectrum is broadened with the first publication in which the term was used in the arts due to the reason that there is a direct relationship between the two. Third, a comparison and discussion of minimal art and minimal music is provided regarding the main question of whether minimal music is a misnomer by choosing two representative works from each discipline. Fourth, alternative terminology is discussed in an attempt to provide an answer to the fundamental question, the objective of the paper.\nAt the end of the historical, theoretical and aesthetic enquiry, it is proposed that the term ‘minimal’ is not completely inaccurate to denote this music; however, regarding minimalist music as the ‘emancipation of repetition’ provides more insight into evaluating its importance in Western art music.","PeriodicalId":120395,"journal":{"name":"Porte Akademik Müzik ve Dans Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porte Akademik Müzik ve Dans Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59446/porteakademik.1292776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether the term ‘minimal’ is appropriate for the music to which it refers to has been a subject of debate among scholars and composers. Many alternative terms were suggested as substitutions or complements. Consequently, the extent to which minimalist music is minimal has been discussed. Most of the previous studies on the distinctive qualities of minimal music and whether the term is misleading provided either a discussion of the alternative terminology or a comparison of minimal art and music; on the other hand, this essay aims to investigate the ways in which minimal music is ‘minimal’ with a broader view from the perspectives of different disciplines, which is necessary. First, previous studies on understanding why such music and art are considered ‘minimal’ are reviewed and compared. To establish a broader perspective for accuracy, the focus is not limited to the period between the 1960s and 1980s, when minimalist music appeared, developed, and flourished. Sociocultural dynamics surrounding this art and music are also considered since they reflect in the surface qualities of the works; hence a two-way relationship. However, the related sociocultural aspects are only briefly mentioned since they are not in the main scope of this study. Second, the first known publication in which the term is used in a distinctive musical context is presented and discussed in addition to the other starting points suggested by scholars; moreover, the spectrum is broadened with the first publication in which the term was used in the arts due to the reason that there is a direct relationship between the two. Third, a comparison and discussion of minimal art and minimal music is provided regarding the main question of whether minimal music is a misnomer by choosing two representative works from each discipline. Fourth, alternative terminology is discussed in an attempt to provide an answer to the fundamental question, the objective of the paper. At the end of the historical, theoretical and aesthetic enquiry, it is proposed that the term ‘minimal’ is not completely inaccurate to denote this music; however, regarding minimalist music as the ‘emancipation of repetition’ provides more insight into evaluating its importance in Western art music.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“极简”一词是否适用于它所指代的音乐一直是学者和作曲家争论的话题。提出了许多替代或补充的术语。因此,在何种程度上,极简主义音乐是最小的讨论。之前大多数关于极简音乐的独特品质以及该术语是否具有误导性的研究提供了替代术语的讨论或极简艺术与音乐的比较;另一方面,本文旨在从不同学科的角度,以更广泛的视角来研究最小化音乐的“最小化”方式,这是必要的。首先,回顾和比较了之前关于理解为什么这样的音乐和艺术被认为是“最小的”的研究。为了建立一个更广泛的准确性视角,重点并不局限于20世纪60年代至80年代这段极简主义音乐出现、发展和繁荣的时期。围绕这种艺术和音乐的社会文化动态也被考虑,因为它们反映在作品的表面质量;因此这是一种双向关系。然而,相关的社会文化方面只是简要提及,因为它们不在本研究的主要范围内。其次,除了学者们提出的其他起点外,还提出并讨论了第一个已知的出版物,其中该术语在独特的音乐背景下使用;此外,由于两者之间存在直接关系,因此该术语首次用于艺术领域的出版物拓宽了范围。第三,对极简艺术和极简音乐的比较和讨论,通过从每个学科中选择两件代表性作品,来回答“极简音乐是否是一种误称”这一主要问题。第四,讨论了替代术语,试图为基本问题提供答案,这是本文的目的。在历史的、理论的和美学的探究结束时,我们提出用“极简”一词来表示这种音乐并非完全不准确;然而,将极简主义音乐视为“重复的解放”,可以更深入地评估其在西方艺术音乐中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usûlde Hayaletin Ardından Gitmek: Görünmeyen Darplar Müzikal Minimalizm: Bir Yanıltıcı Ad Mı? Gomidas’ın Türkçe-Kürtçe-Ermenice Derlemelerindeki Dans Ezgilerinin Analizi The Performative Reflections of The Vocal Market Style in Turkish Maqam Music in The Early 20th Century A Travel for Intermusicality: Adana'ya Gidek Mi?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1