Limiting value of Reynolds Averaged Simulation in numerical prediction of flow over NACA4415 airfoil

N. Fernando, M. Narayana
{"title":"Limiting value of Reynolds Averaged Simulation in numerical prediction of flow over NACA4415 airfoil","authors":"N. Fernando, M. Narayana","doi":"10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reynolds Averaged Simulation (RAS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) are two widely used turbulence modeling approaches in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). RAS simulations require less computing times than used by LES. When large eddies of flow become dominant, RAS simulations cannot predict accurate results. Hybrid RAS-LES approach is effective solution to reduce computational cost and time. In this approach, only parts of flow where larger eddies become dominant are solved using LES, and other areas are resolved using RAS. In order to apply RAS-LES hybrid models, regions of flow where RAS simulation cannot be applied need to be identified. The present work finds the limiting value of angle of attack for a NACA4415 airfoil where RAS simulation can be applied. Simulations were performed using two widely used RAS turbulence models for angles of attacks ranging from -6 to 16.3 degrees. Then results are compared against experimental data. It is found that for NACA4415 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 1.5 million, RAS simulation can be used to successfully predict flow behavior up to an angle of attack of 4.1 degrees. Based on this limiting angle of attack, an approach is suggested for hybrid RAS-LES simulation for a wind turbine.","PeriodicalId":184790,"journal":{"name":"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Reynolds Averaged Simulation (RAS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) are two widely used turbulence modeling approaches in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). RAS simulations require less computing times than used by LES. When large eddies of flow become dominant, RAS simulations cannot predict accurate results. Hybrid RAS-LES approach is effective solution to reduce computational cost and time. In this approach, only parts of flow where larger eddies become dominant are solved using LES, and other areas are resolved using RAS. In order to apply RAS-LES hybrid models, regions of flow where RAS simulation cannot be applied need to be identified. The present work finds the limiting value of angle of attack for a NACA4415 airfoil where RAS simulation can be applied. Simulations were performed using two widely used RAS turbulence models for angles of attacks ranging from -6 to 16.3 degrees. Then results are compared against experimental data. It is found that for NACA4415 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 1.5 million, RAS simulation can be used to successfully predict flow behavior up to an angle of attack of 4.1 degrees. Based on this limiting angle of attack, an approach is suggested for hybrid RAS-LES simulation for a wind turbine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雷诺平均模拟在NACA4415翼型流动数值预测中的极限值
雷诺平均模拟(RAS)和大涡模拟(LES)是计算流体力学(CFD)中应用广泛的两种湍流模拟方法。与LES相比,RAS模拟所需的计算时间更少。当大涡流占据主导地位时,RAS模拟无法预测准确的结果。混合RAS-LES方法是减少计算成本和时间的有效解决方案。在这种方法中,只有较大涡流占主导地位的部分流使用LES解决,其他区域使用RAS解决。为了应用RAS- les混合模型,需要确定不能应用RAS模拟的流动区域。本文研究了NACA4415型翼型迎角的极限值,并对其进行了RAS仿真。模拟使用了两种广泛使用的RAS湍流模型,攻角范围从-6到16.3度。然后将结果与实验数据进行比较。研究发现,对于雷诺数为150万的NACA4415翼型,RAS模拟可以成功地预测攻角为4.1度的流动行为。在此基础上,提出了一种风力机RAS-LES混合仿真方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and construction of an automated test bench for MCB testing Stability analysis for a twin boom H- tail Medium Scale UAV through simulated dynamic model Command Governor Adaptive Control for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles with measurement noise and actuator dead-zone An automatic classifier for exam questions with WordNet and Cosine similarity Numerical modelling of the behaviour of model shallow foundations on geocell reinforced sand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1