Techno-Economic Evaluation of Strategic Solutions to Extend the Range of Electric Vehicles

M. Weigelt, A. Mayr, M. Masuch, Kilian Batz, J. Franke, Peter M. Bican, A. Brem, J. Russer, P. Russer
{"title":"Techno-Economic Evaluation of Strategic Solutions to Extend the Range of Electric Vehicles","authors":"M. Weigelt, A. Mayr, M. Masuch, Kilian Batz, J. Franke, Peter M. Bican, A. Brem, J. Russer, P. Russer","doi":"10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of electric mobility in Germany lags far behind government's targets. High vehicle and energy prices, the limited vehicle range and obligatory time-consuming conductive charging processes are the main obstacles to mass adoption. Strategic mobility concepts, such as electric vehicles with high performance batteries (BEV), hydrogen technologies (FCEV), or dynamic inductive charging (IPTEV), i.e. a constant energy supply while the vehicle is in motion, can overcome those obstacles in Germany and beyond. Numerous studies investigated the different energy sources and compared potential drive technologies. However, in most prior studies, only partial aspects of a specific technology are considered. The contribution of this study is in providing a comprehensive technology comparison, enabling a thorough analysis and evaluation of various technological alternatives for solving the range problem of electric vehicles. For this purpose, a general framework as well as technology-specific key indicators and aspects are presented. The holistic evaluation of the technologies is carried out on the basis of specially defined evaluation criteria, with the focus on passenger car and commercial vehicle applications. In order to ensure a comparison that is as unbiased and objective as possible, measures are adjusted to avoid bias of key figures. Finally, the consideration of foreseeable macroeconomic and technological developments should ensure that long-term valid statements can also be derived from the results of the investigation.","PeriodicalId":358881,"journal":{"name":"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The spread of electric mobility in Germany lags far behind government's targets. High vehicle and energy prices, the limited vehicle range and obligatory time-consuming conductive charging processes are the main obstacles to mass adoption. Strategic mobility concepts, such as electric vehicles with high performance batteries (BEV), hydrogen technologies (FCEV), or dynamic inductive charging (IPTEV), i.e. a constant energy supply while the vehicle is in motion, can overcome those obstacles in Germany and beyond. Numerous studies investigated the different energy sources and compared potential drive technologies. However, in most prior studies, only partial aspects of a specific technology are considered. The contribution of this study is in providing a comprehensive technology comparison, enabling a thorough analysis and evaluation of various technological alternatives for solving the range problem of electric vehicles. For this purpose, a general framework as well as technology-specific key indicators and aspects are presented. The holistic evaluation of the technologies is carried out on the basis of specially defined evaluation criteria, with the focus on passenger car and commercial vehicle applications. In order to ensure a comparison that is as unbiased and objective as possible, measures are adjusted to avoid bias of key figures. Finally, the consideration of foreseeable macroeconomic and technological developments should ensure that long-term valid statements can also be derived from the results of the investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车续驶里程战略解决方案的技术经济评价
德国电动汽车的普及远远落后于政府的目标。高昂的汽车和能源价格、有限的行驶里程以及强制性耗时的导电充电过程是大规模采用的主要障碍。战略移动性概念,如高性能电池(BEV)电动汽车、氢技术(FCEV)或动态感应充电(IPTEV),即车辆行驶时的持续能源供应,可以克服德国及其他国家的这些障碍。许多研究调查了不同的能源并比较了潜在的驱动技术。然而,在大多数先前的研究中,只考虑了特定技术的部分方面。本研究的贡献在于提供了一个全面的技术比较,能够对解决电动汽车续航里程问题的各种技术选择进行全面的分析和评估。为此目的,提出了一个总体框架以及具体技术的关键指标和方面。根据专门制定的评价标准对技术进行整体评价,重点是乘用车和商用车的应用。为了确保比较尽可能公正和客观,调整了测量方法以避免关键数据的偏差。最后,考虑到可预见的宏观经济和技术发展,应确保也能从调查结果中得出长期有效的陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Performance and Manufacturing Aspects of an Insert Winding and a Hairpin Winding for an Automotive Machine Application Alternative Fabrication Strategies for the Production of Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors for Enhanced Performance Characteristics Systematic Development and Comparison of Concepts for an Automated Series-Flexible Trickle Winding Process Exhaustive Data- and Problem-Driven use Case Identification and Implementation for Electric Drive Production High Frequency Modelling of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1