A Semantic Account of Adverbials as Discourse Connectives

Katherine Forbes-Riley, B. Webber
{"title":"A Semantic Account of Adverbials as Discourse Connectives","authors":"Katherine Forbes-Riley, B. Webber","doi":"10.3115/1118121.1118125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the question of why certain adverb and preposition phrases are only interpretable with respect to the discourse, and not just their own matrix clause. We show that, in many cases, an adverbial's compositional semantics explains why. We close by reporting on an annotation study aimed at providing specific evidence for how adverbials are interpreted with respect to the discourse.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1118121.1118125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We address the question of why certain adverb and preposition phrases are only interpretable with respect to the discourse, and not just their own matrix clause. We show that, in many cases, an adverbial's compositional semantics explains why. We close by reporting on an annotation study aimed at providing specific evidence for how adverbials are interpreted with respect to the discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
状语作为语篇连接词的语义解释
我们解决的问题,为什么某些副词和介词短语只能解释相对于话语,而不仅仅是他们自己的矩阵子句。我们表明,在许多情况下,状语的组成语义解释了其中的原因。最后,我们报告了一项注释研究,旨在为状语如何根据语篇进行解释提供具体证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1