Comparative Study of Visual Question Answering Algorithms

A. Mostafa, Hazem M. Abbas, M. Khalil
{"title":"Comparative Study of Visual Question Answering Algorithms","authors":"A. Mostafa, Hazem M. Abbas, M. Khalil","doi":"10.1109/ICCES51560.2020.9334686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a recent task that challenges algorithms to reason about the visual content of an image to be able to answer a natural language question. In this study, we compare the performance of state of the art VQA algorithms on different VQA benchmarks. Each benchmark is more effective at testing VQA algorithms on different levels. Some datasets challenge the algorithms to perform complex reasoning steps to arrive to an answer. Other datasets might challenge algorithms to retrieve external world knowledge to answer the posed questions. We categorize the algorithms by their main contributions into 4 categories. Firstly, the joint embedding approach which focuses on how to map the visual and textual data into a common embedding space. Secondly, attention based methods which focuses on relevant parts of the image or the question. Thirdly, compositional models which deal with composing a model from smaller modules. Finally, we introduce external-knowledge based algorithms which need external sources to be able to retrieve facts necessary to answer a question when those facts may not be present in the scene nor in the whole training data set. We also mention other algorithms that don’t specifically belong to the aforementioned categories, but offers performance competitive with the state of the art.","PeriodicalId":247183,"journal":{"name":"2020 15th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 15th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES51560.2020.9334686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a recent task that challenges algorithms to reason about the visual content of an image to be able to answer a natural language question. In this study, we compare the performance of state of the art VQA algorithms on different VQA benchmarks. Each benchmark is more effective at testing VQA algorithms on different levels. Some datasets challenge the algorithms to perform complex reasoning steps to arrive to an answer. Other datasets might challenge algorithms to retrieve external world knowledge to answer the posed questions. We categorize the algorithms by their main contributions into 4 categories. Firstly, the joint embedding approach which focuses on how to map the visual and textual data into a common embedding space. Secondly, attention based methods which focuses on relevant parts of the image or the question. Thirdly, compositional models which deal with composing a model from smaller modules. Finally, we introduce external-knowledge based algorithms which need external sources to be able to retrieve facts necessary to answer a question when those facts may not be present in the scene nor in the whole training data set. We also mention other algorithms that don’t specifically belong to the aforementioned categories, but offers performance competitive with the state of the art.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉问答算法的比较研究
视觉问答(VQA)是最近的一项任务,它挑战算法对图像的视觉内容进行推理,从而能够回答自然语言问题。在本研究中,我们比较了最先进的VQA算法在不同VQA基准上的性能。每个基准在测试不同级别的VQA算法时更有效。一些数据集要求算法执行复杂的推理步骤来得到答案。其他数据集可能会挑战检索外部世界知识来回答所提出问题的算法。我们根据算法的主要贡献将其分为4类。首先是联合嵌入方法,主要研究如何将可视化和文本数据映射到一个公共的嵌入空间中。其次是基于注意力的方法,即关注图像或问题的相关部分。第三,组合模型,它处理由较小的模块组成一个模型。最后,我们引入了基于外部知识的算法,当这些事实可能不存在于场景或整个训练数据集中时,这些算法需要外部源来检索回答问题所需的事实。我们还提到了其他不属于上述类别的算法,但提供了与最先进的性能相竞争的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Proposed System for the Identification of Modem Arabic Poetry Meters (IMAP) Evaluating the Modsecurity Web Application Firewall Against SQL Injection Attacks Low-Power Low-Complexity FM-UWB Transmitter in 130nm CMOS for WBAN Applications Blade Angle Control Using TLBO Based Modified Adaptive Controller Clustering Research Papers Using Genetic Algorithm Optimized Self-Organizing Maps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1