The Role of Religion in Shaping Responses to Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions

D. Chester, A. Duncan, R. Coutinho, N. Wallenstein
{"title":"The Role of Religion in Shaping Responses to Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions","authors":"D. Chester, A. Duncan, R. Coutinho, N. Wallenstein","doi":"10.1628/PTSC-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to the situation only a few years ago, the case for religion being accepted as a vital element in the cultural responses to disasters has been largely accepted by both academic writers and international agencies, such as the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Religions are far more varied in their approaches to natural catastrophes than is frequently recognised or acknowledged by academic writers who are trained and socialised within a 'western' post-Enlightenment tradition. In this paper we seek to demonstrate how detailed religious responses to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions vary even between two societies, southern Italy and the Azores, which are broadly similar in terms of their southern European Catholic religiosity. In southern Italy, popular Catholicism has conflated two approaches to theodicy: the retributive and the Augustinianism (i.e. free-will). Divine wrath may be propitiated through piety and Christian action, which includes worship, repentance, changed conduct and is often associated with well-choreographed ritualistic actions, some of the latter being far removed from Catholic orthodoxy. Such reactions to disaster are not confined to the past but remain strongly embedded in present-day practice. In the Azores a combination of: a history of a better educated and more enlightened church leadership; greater emphasis on praxis following disasters; the growth of the distinctive, egalitarian and pastorally focused Cult do Esparto Santo (i.e. Cult of the Holy Spirit) and the spread of alternative models of theodicy through educational outreach, has produced a strongly contrasting religious response. We conclude that, in the case of the Azores the religious milieu favours active collaboration between the Catholic faith community and the Civil Defence authorities in the aftermath of disasters, whereas this is not the case in southern Italy, although there are some recent signs of change.","PeriodicalId":114102,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences","volume":"37 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/PTSC-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In contrast to the situation only a few years ago, the case for religion being accepted as a vital element in the cultural responses to disasters has been largely accepted by both academic writers and international agencies, such as the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Religions are far more varied in their approaches to natural catastrophes than is frequently recognised or acknowledged by academic writers who are trained and socialised within a 'western' post-Enlightenment tradition. In this paper we seek to demonstrate how detailed religious responses to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions vary even between two societies, southern Italy and the Azores, which are broadly similar in terms of their southern European Catholic religiosity. In southern Italy, popular Catholicism has conflated two approaches to theodicy: the retributive and the Augustinianism (i.e. free-will). Divine wrath may be propitiated through piety and Christian action, which includes worship, repentance, changed conduct and is often associated with well-choreographed ritualistic actions, some of the latter being far removed from Catholic orthodoxy. Such reactions to disaster are not confined to the past but remain strongly embedded in present-day practice. In the Azores a combination of: a history of a better educated and more enlightened church leadership; greater emphasis on praxis following disasters; the growth of the distinctive, egalitarian and pastorally focused Cult do Esparto Santo (i.e. Cult of the Holy Spirit) and the spread of alternative models of theodicy through educational outreach, has produced a strongly contrasting religious response. We conclude that, in the case of the Azores the religious milieu favours active collaboration between the Catholic faith community and the Civil Defence authorities in the aftermath of disasters, whereas this is not the case in southern Italy, although there are some recent signs of change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教在形成对地震和火山爆发的反应中的作用
与仅仅几年前的情况相反,学术界作家和红十字会和红新月会国际联合会等国际机构基本上都接受了宗教作为对灾害作出文化反应的一个重要因素的观点。宗教对待自然灾害的方法远比那些在“西方”后启蒙传统中受过训练和社交的学术作家所经常认识或承认的要多样化得多。在本文中,我们试图证明,即使在意大利南部和亚速尔群岛这两个社会之间,对地震和火山爆发的详细宗教反应是如何不同的,这两个社会在南欧天主教的宗教信仰方面大致相似。在意大利南部,流行的天主教已经将两种方法合并为神正论:报应论和奥古斯丁主义(即自由意志)。神的愤怒可以通过虔诚和基督教的行为来平息,其中包括崇拜,悔改,改变行为,通常与精心设计的仪式行为有关,后者中的一些与天主教正统教义相去甚远。这种对灾难的反应并不局限于过去,而是深深植根于当今的实践中。在亚速尔群岛,有以下因素:受过更好教育和更开明的教会领导层的历史;更加强调灾后实践;独特的、平等主义的、以牧师为中心的Cult do Esparto Santo(即圣灵崇拜)的发展,以及通过教育推广的神正论的其他模式的传播,产生了强烈对比的宗教反应。我们的结论是,就亚速尔群岛而言,宗教环境有利于天主教信仰团体和民防当局在灾难发生后进行积极合作,而意大利南部的情况并非如此,尽管最近出现了一些变化的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Religion in Shaping Responses to Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions The Endangered Self as a Challenge to Religion Gender as Context in Science and Religion Religion and Science Irenaeus' Gratitude and Derrida's Gift: Time, Death, Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1