Black Loyalist Hunger Prevention in Sierra Leone

Rachel B. Herrmann
{"title":"Black Loyalist Hunger Prevention in Sierra Leone","authors":"Rachel B. Herrmann","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes how, from 1792 to 1800, black colonists in Freetown, Sierra Leone—also referred to hereafter as “black Loyalists” and “Nova Scotians”—won several battles in the fight against black hunger. The Nova Scotians arrived in Africa in 1792 imbued with a sense of how to use food laws to exert dominance, and within half a decade, they had learned to behave as British subjects entitled to enforce that power. Whereas in Nova Scotia white Loyalists' food laws had controlled former bondpeople's access to food, in Sierra Leone, black colonists gained the right to enact their own antihunger rules, which white colonists uniformly approved, beginning in 1793. These Nova Scotians fought famine first by regulating their trade in alcohol, bread, fish, and meat. Later, the black Loyalists tried to regulate the trade of Africans, particularly Susu and Temne. These laws enabled former victual warriors to try to become victual imperialists by altering African food sales while occupying African land. This attempt failed because violent Temne and Susu reactions to colonists' price-fixing encouraged white councilmen in Sierra Leone to curtail black Loyalist lawmaking; those councilmen would later try to interfere with Africans' trade.","PeriodicalId":311322,"journal":{"name":"No Useless Mouth","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No Useless Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes how, from 1792 to 1800, black colonists in Freetown, Sierra Leone—also referred to hereafter as “black Loyalists” and “Nova Scotians”—won several battles in the fight against black hunger. The Nova Scotians arrived in Africa in 1792 imbued with a sense of how to use food laws to exert dominance, and within half a decade, they had learned to behave as British subjects entitled to enforce that power. Whereas in Nova Scotia white Loyalists' food laws had controlled former bondpeople's access to food, in Sierra Leone, black colonists gained the right to enact their own antihunger rules, which white colonists uniformly approved, beginning in 1793. These Nova Scotians fought famine first by regulating their trade in alcohol, bread, fish, and meat. Later, the black Loyalists tried to regulate the trade of Africans, particularly Susu and Temne. These laws enabled former victual warriors to try to become victual imperialists by altering African food sales while occupying African land. This attempt failed because violent Temne and Susu reactions to colonists' price-fixing encouraged white councilmen in Sierra Leone to curtail black Loyalist lawmaking; those councilmen would later try to interfere with Africans' trade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞拉利昂黑人保皇派预防饥饿组织
本章描述了从1792年到1800年,塞拉利昂弗里敦的黑人殖民者——以后也被称为“黑人保皇派”和“新斯科舍人”——如何在与黑人饥饿的斗争中赢得几次胜利。1792年,新斯科舍省人来到非洲,他们充满了如何利用食品法来行使统治地位的意识,在五年内,他们学会了作为有权行使这种权力的英国臣民的行为。在新斯科舍省,白人保皇派的食物法控制了前奴隶获得食物的途径,而在塞拉利昂,黑人殖民者从1793年开始获得了制定自己的反饥饿规则的权利,这些规则得到了白人殖民者的一致批准。这些新斯科舍人首先通过规范酒精、面包、鱼和肉的贸易来对抗饥荒。后来,黑人保王党试图规范非洲人的贸易,特别是苏苏和坦内。这些法律使得曾经的粮食战士在占领非洲土地的同时,通过改变非洲的粮食销售,试图成为粮食帝国主义者。这一尝试失败了,因为泰姆尼和苏苏人对殖民者操纵价格的暴力反应鼓励了塞拉利昂的白人议员限制黑人保皇派的立法;这些议员后来试图干涉非洲人的贸易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Fighting Hunger, Fearing Violence after the Revolutionary War 4. Black Victual Warriors and Hunger Creation 1. Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1