Known and unknown unknowns: Uncertainty estimation in satellite remote sensing data

A. Povey, R. Grainger
{"title":"Known and unknown unknowns: Uncertainty estimation in satellite remote sensing data","authors":"A. Povey, R. Grainger","doi":"10.5194/AMT-8-4699-2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An estimate of uncertainty is necessary to make appropriate use of the information conveyed by a measurement. Traditional error propagation quantifies the uncertainty in a measurement due to well-understood perturbations in a measurement and auxiliary data – known, quantified `unknowns'. The underconstrained nature of most satellite remote sensing observations requires the use of approximations and assumptions that produce non-linear systematic errors that are not readily assessed – known, unquantifiable `unknowns'. Additional errors result from the inability of a measurement to resolve all scales and aspects of variation in a system – unknown `unknowns'. The latter two categories of error are dominant in satellite remote sensing and the difficulty of their quantification limits the utility of existing uncertainty estimates, degrading confidence in such data.\n\nEnsemble techniques present multiple self-consistent realisations of a data set as a means of depicting unquantified uncertainties, generated using various algorithms or forward models believed to be appropriate to the conditions observed. Benefiting from the experience of the climate modelling community, an ensemble provides a user with a more accurate representation of the uncertainty as understood by the data producer and greater freedom to exploit the advantages and disadvantages of different manners of describing a physical system.\n\nThe technique will be demonstrated with retrievals of aerosol, cloud, and surface properties, for which many sources of error cannot currently be quantified (such as the assumed aerosol microphysical properties). The Optimal Retrieval of Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC) can produce an ensemble by evaluating data with a succession of microphysical models (e.g. liquid cloud, urban aerosol, etc.). A further ensemble can be formed from products produced by various European institutions. These will be used to demonstrate uncertainties in such observations that are poorly characterised in current products.","PeriodicalId":238120,"journal":{"name":"ORA review team","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORA review team","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-8-4699-2015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

An estimate of uncertainty is necessary to make appropriate use of the information conveyed by a measurement. Traditional error propagation quantifies the uncertainty in a measurement due to well-understood perturbations in a measurement and auxiliary data – known, quantified `unknowns'. The underconstrained nature of most satellite remote sensing observations requires the use of approximations and assumptions that produce non-linear systematic errors that are not readily assessed – known, unquantifiable `unknowns'. Additional errors result from the inability of a measurement to resolve all scales and aspects of variation in a system – unknown `unknowns'. The latter two categories of error are dominant in satellite remote sensing and the difficulty of their quantification limits the utility of existing uncertainty estimates, degrading confidence in such data. Ensemble techniques present multiple self-consistent realisations of a data set as a means of depicting unquantified uncertainties, generated using various algorithms or forward models believed to be appropriate to the conditions observed. Benefiting from the experience of the climate modelling community, an ensemble provides a user with a more accurate representation of the uncertainty as understood by the data producer and greater freedom to exploit the advantages and disadvantages of different manners of describing a physical system. The technique will be demonstrated with retrievals of aerosol, cloud, and surface properties, for which many sources of error cannot currently be quantified (such as the assumed aerosol microphysical properties). The Optimal Retrieval of Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC) can produce an ensemble by evaluating data with a succession of microphysical models (e.g. liquid cloud, urban aerosol, etc.). A further ensemble can be formed from products produced by various European institutions. These will be used to demonstrate uncertainties in such observations that are poorly characterised in current products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
已知和未知的未知数:卫星遥感数据的不确定性估计
为了恰当地利用测量所传达的信息,不确定度的估计是必要的。传统的误差传播量化了测量中的不确定性,这些不确定性是由于测量和辅助数据中众所周知的扰动而产生的——已知的、量化的“未知数”。大多数卫星遥感观测的欠约束性质要求使用产生不易评估的非线性系统误差的近似值和假设——已知的、无法量化的“未知数”。额外的误差是由于测量无法解决系统中所有的尺度和变化方面——未知的“未知数”。后两类误差在卫星遥感中占主导地位,它们难以量化,限制了现有不确定性估计的利用,降低了对这类数据的信心。集成技术提供了数据集的多个自一致实现,作为描述非量化不确定性的手段,使用各种算法或被认为适合观察到的条件的正演模型生成。得益于气候模拟界的经验,集合为用户提供了对数据生产者所理解的不确定性的更准确的表示,并为利用描述物理系统的不同方式的优缺点提供了更大的自由。该技术将通过气溶胶、云和表面特性的检索来演示,因为目前许多误差来源无法量化(例如假设的气溶胶微物理特性)。气溶胶和云的最佳检索(ORAC)可以通过对一系列微物理模型(如液体云、城市气溶胶等)的数据进行评估来产生一个集合。欧洲各机构生产的产品可以形成一个进一步的整体。这些将用于证明在当前产品中特征不佳的此类观测中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keeping to William Hazlitt Known and unknown unknowns: Uncertainty estimation in satellite remote sensing data Mutual interplay between perceptual organization and attention: a neuropsychological perspective Pain, experience, and well-being New Fragments of the Demotic Mut Text in Copenhagen and Florence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1