Error assessment of HF radar-based ocean current measurements: An error model based on sub-period measurement variance

K. Laws, J. Vesecky, J. Paduan
{"title":"Error assessment of HF radar-based ocean current measurements: An error model based on sub-period measurement variance","authors":"K. Laws, J. Vesecky, J. Paduan","doi":"10.1109/CWTM.2011.5759527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data from CODAR-type ocean current sensing radar systems are used here to evaluate the performance of an error indicator provided as part of the available radar data. Investigations are based on data from pairs of radar systems with over-water baselines. Approximately year-long time series are used. The radar data are the typical hourly radial measurements provided by CODAR systems. These measurements are actually the median (or mean) of anywhere between 2 and 7 sub-hourly measurements collected by the radar system. The error indicator under examination is based on the standard deviation (std) of the sub-hourly radials, divided by the square root of the number of sub-hourly radials. These values are recorded in the hourly data files produced by recent versions of the CODAR data processing software. Examination of the model demonstrates a positive correlation between the model and the measured baseline difference std for all baseline pairs examined. The predictive capability of the error model is demonstrated by presenting its use as a data discriminator and by examination of time series of sliding boxcar samples of radar data. Baseline difference std for data rejected by a threshold based on the error model is shown to be significantly higher than for the data retained. The results presented here demonstrate potential to improve assessment of the HF radar current measurement uncertainty. Such improvement has potential to benefit all applications of HF radar data, including for example, Lagrangian particle tracking and surface current assimilation into numerical models.","PeriodicalId":345178,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/OES 10th Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurements (CWTM)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/OES 10th Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurements (CWTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CWTM.2011.5759527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Data from CODAR-type ocean current sensing radar systems are used here to evaluate the performance of an error indicator provided as part of the available radar data. Investigations are based on data from pairs of radar systems with over-water baselines. Approximately year-long time series are used. The radar data are the typical hourly radial measurements provided by CODAR systems. These measurements are actually the median (or mean) of anywhere between 2 and 7 sub-hourly measurements collected by the radar system. The error indicator under examination is based on the standard deviation (std) of the sub-hourly radials, divided by the square root of the number of sub-hourly radials. These values are recorded in the hourly data files produced by recent versions of the CODAR data processing software. Examination of the model demonstrates a positive correlation between the model and the measured baseline difference std for all baseline pairs examined. The predictive capability of the error model is demonstrated by presenting its use as a data discriminator and by examination of time series of sliding boxcar samples of radar data. Baseline difference std for data rejected by a threshold based on the error model is shown to be significantly higher than for the data retained. The results presented here demonstrate potential to improve assessment of the HF radar current measurement uncertainty. Such improvement has potential to benefit all applications of HF radar data, including for example, Lagrangian particle tracking and surface current assimilation into numerical models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高频雷达海流测量误差评估:基于子周期测量方差的误差模型
本文使用来自codar型海流感应雷达系统的数据来评估作为可用雷达数据的一部分而提供的误差指示器的性能。调查依据的是具有水上基线的雷达系统对的数据。使用大约一年的时间序列。雷达数据是典型的每小时径向测量由CODAR系统提供。这些测量值实际上是雷达系统收集的每小时2到7次测量值的中位数(或平均值)。所研究的误差指标是基于分小时径向的标准差(std)除以分小时径向数目的平方根。这些数值记录在最新版本的CODAR数据处理软件产生的每小时数据文件中。对模型的检验表明,对所有检验的基线对,模型与测量的基线差异标准之间存在正相关。通过将误差模型用作数据鉴别器和对雷达数据滑动箱车样本的时间序列进行检验,证明了误差模型的预测能力。基于误差模型的阈值拒绝的数据的基线差异std明显高于保留的数据。本文的研究结果表明了改进高频雷达电流测量不确定度评估的潜力。这种改进有可能使高频雷达数据的所有应用受益,例如,拉格朗日粒子跟踪和地表电流同化到数值模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization and testing of a new bistatic profiling acoustic Doppler velocimeter: The Vectrino-II After 40 years, how are HF radar currents now being used? Observations of wave breaking and surf zone width from a real-time cross-shore array of wave and current sensors at Duck, NC Performance of the nortek Aquadopp Z-Cell Profiler on a NOAA surface buoy High Resolution Doppler profiler measurements of turbulence from a profiling body
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1