{"title":"The Old Aramaic Alphabet at Tell Halaf the Date of the \"Altar\" Inscription","authors":"R. Bowman","doi":"10.1086/370618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1931 Baron von Oppenheim, reporting on his excavation at Tell Halaf, wrote: \"In der Kaparaschicht fanden wir ein kleines Kalksteinaltairchen mit einigen wenigen, leider nicht entzifferbaren altsemitischen Schriftzeichen.\"' No further stratigraphic detail has been released on this piece which, therefore, must be discussed apart from any exact archeological context. Meissner, from the character of the cuneiform signs, peculiarities of language, and the point of view expressed in the short cuneiform inscriptions of Kapara, feels that a date in the twelfth century B.c. is fitting for the Kapara stratum.2 Von Oppenheim insists that the date of the small finds of the stratum and the views of B. Landsberger with regard to the earliest possible presence of Aramaeans in Mesopotamia also support the twelfth century B.C. date.3 The twelfth-century date has been widely accepted4 but not without considerable opposition.5 The publication of the Kapara Aramaic inscription, long awaited, has finally appeared as the work of Johannes Friedrich.6 A hand copy of the inscription is given (Fig. 1) but, unfortunately, no photograph. Friedrich transliterates it as `rlt 1 \"T [(x)x]by2 I r)\"IT but, with re1 M. F. von Oppenheim, Der Tell Halaf (Leipzig, 1931), p. 65; cf. English translation by G. Wheeler, p. 70. The expanded French edition, which I understand is in preparation, is not available. 2 B. Meissner, apud von Oppenheim, op. cit., p. 266 (English ed., p. 316). S. Langdon, Oxford Magazine, June 15, 1933, p. 812, on the basis of the cuneiform signs, dated the Kapara inscriptions to the tenth century B.c. There can be no certainty in dating based on cuneiform script alone.","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1941-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
In 1931 Baron von Oppenheim, reporting on his excavation at Tell Halaf, wrote: "In der Kaparaschicht fanden wir ein kleines Kalksteinaltairchen mit einigen wenigen, leider nicht entzifferbaren altsemitischen Schriftzeichen."' No further stratigraphic detail has been released on this piece which, therefore, must be discussed apart from any exact archeological context. Meissner, from the character of the cuneiform signs, peculiarities of language, and the point of view expressed in the short cuneiform inscriptions of Kapara, feels that a date in the twelfth century B.c. is fitting for the Kapara stratum.2 Von Oppenheim insists that the date of the small finds of the stratum and the views of B. Landsberger with regard to the earliest possible presence of Aramaeans in Mesopotamia also support the twelfth century B.C. date.3 The twelfth-century date has been widely accepted4 but not without considerable opposition.5 The publication of the Kapara Aramaic inscription, long awaited, has finally appeared as the work of Johannes Friedrich.6 A hand copy of the inscription is given (Fig. 1) but, unfortunately, no photograph. Friedrich transliterates it as `rlt 1 "T [(x)x]by2 I r)"IT but, with re1 M. F. von Oppenheim, Der Tell Halaf (Leipzig, 1931), p. 65; cf. English translation by G. Wheeler, p. 70. The expanded French edition, which I understand is in preparation, is not available. 2 B. Meissner, apud von Oppenheim, op. cit., p. 266 (English ed., p. 316). S. Langdon, Oxford Magazine, June 15, 1933, p. 812, on the basis of the cuneiform signs, dated the Kapara inscriptions to the tenth century B.c. There can be no certainty in dating based on cuneiform script alone.
1931年,冯·奥本海姆男爵在报告他在泰尔哈拉夫的发掘时写道:“In der Kaparaschicht fanden wir ein kleines Kalksteinaltairchen mit einigen wenigen, leider nicht entzifferbaren altsemitischen Schriftzeichen。”没有进一步的地层细节被公布,因此,必须在任何确切的考古背景之外进行讨论。迈斯纳根据楔形文字符号的特征、语言的特点以及卡帕拉简短的楔形文字铭文所表达的观点,认为公元前12世纪是卡帕拉地层的合适年代冯·奥本海姆坚持认为,地层小发现的日期和B. Landsberger关于阿拉米人最早可能出现在美索不达米亚的观点也支持公元前12世纪的日期12世纪的日期已被广泛接受,但并非没有相当大的反对意见期待已久的卡帕拉阿拉姆文铭文终于作为约翰内斯·弗里德里希的作品出版了。6给出了铭文的手抄本(图1),但不幸的是,没有照片。弗里德里希将其音译为“rlt 1”T [(x)x]by2 I r)但是,与re1 M. F. von Oppenheim, Der Tell Halaf(莱比锡,1931),第65页;参见惠勒的英译,第70页。据我所知正在编写的法文增订本没有。2 B.迈斯纳:《阿波德·冯·奥本海姆》,同城,第266页(英文版,第316页)。S.兰登,《牛津杂志》,1933年6月15日,第812页,根据楔形文字的符号,卡帕拉铭文的年代可以追溯到公元前10世纪。单凭楔形文字的文字不能确定年代。