Information Exchange between Smugglers and Migrants: An Analysis of Online Interactions in Facebook Groups

Zoe Roberts
{"title":"Information Exchange between Smugglers and Migrants: An Analysis of Online Interactions in Facebook Groups","authors":"Zoe Roberts","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3051186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human smuggling is an imperfect and inconsistent service due to its illicit nature, which means that problems can arise for all those involved; for smugglers the problem is how to cultivate and communicate their reputation as a bona fide smuggler, and for migrants it is just difficult to know whom to trust. The following study is an exploration of how Arabic-speaking smugglers and migrants interact with each other using the medium of Facebook. Taking a transactional approach as the theoretical framework, this study analyses the concerns raised in this online discourse, the information shared, and the ways in which both sides deal with the challenges they face. The diverse content across the 10 Facebook groups in the sample indicate firstly that smugglers who are concerned about their reputation of trustworthiness use the technological facilities of Facebook to help signal this to prospective clients, such as images, screenshots, and videos. Also posting in these groups, migrants pose many kinds of questions to the online community as a way of informing themselves. Other input from migrants is to give feedback on smugglers, which is positive or negative depending on their experience, as part of a mechanism driven by information sharers. The content of these groups further indicates that the smuggling market, at least online, is competitive and there are cases of specialisation in terms of the services provided.","PeriodicalId":350529,"journal":{"name":"Criminology eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3051186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Human smuggling is an imperfect and inconsistent service due to its illicit nature, which means that problems can arise for all those involved; for smugglers the problem is how to cultivate and communicate their reputation as a bona fide smuggler, and for migrants it is just difficult to know whom to trust. The following study is an exploration of how Arabic-speaking smugglers and migrants interact with each other using the medium of Facebook. Taking a transactional approach as the theoretical framework, this study analyses the concerns raised in this online discourse, the information shared, and the ways in which both sides deal with the challenges they face. The diverse content across the 10 Facebook groups in the sample indicate firstly that smugglers who are concerned about their reputation of trustworthiness use the technological facilities of Facebook to help signal this to prospective clients, such as images, screenshots, and videos. Also posting in these groups, migrants pose many kinds of questions to the online community as a way of informing themselves. Other input from migrants is to give feedback on smugglers, which is positive or negative depending on their experience, as part of a mechanism driven by information sharers. The content of these groups further indicates that the smuggling market, at least online, is competitive and there are cases of specialisation in terms of the services provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走私者和移民之间的信息交换:对Facebook群组在线互动的分析
人口走私由于其非法性质,是一项不完善和不一致的服务,这意味着所有相关人员都可能出现问题;对于走私者来说,问题是如何培养和传播他们作为一个真正的走私者的声誉,而对于移民来说,很难知道该信任谁。下面的研究是探索说阿拉伯语的走私者和移民如何使用Facebook这个媒介相互交流。本研究以交易方法为理论框架,分析双方在网络话语中所提出的关切、所共享的信息以及双方应对所面临挑战的方式。样本中10个Facebook群组的不同内容首先表明,担心自己信誉的走私者使用Facebook的技术设施,如图片、截图和视频,帮助向潜在客户传达这一信息。移民们也在这些群里发帖,向网络社区提出各种各样的问题,作为一种告知自己的方式。移民的其他投入是向走私者提供反馈,这取决于他们的经验,是积极的还是消极的,这是由信息共享者推动的机制的一部分。这些团体的内容进一步表明,走私市场,至少在网上,是竞争激烈的,而且在提供服务方面存在专业化的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broken Windows Policing and Crime: Evidence from 80 Colombian Cities La indemnización por condenas erróneas: una visión desde el derecho comparado (Reparation for Wrongful Convictions: A Perspective from Comparative Law) Does More Entrepreneurship Benefit Society? The Effect on Community Crime Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment The Deterrent Effect of Surveillance Cameras on Crime The Breakdown of Anti-Racist Norms: A Natural Experiment on Normative Uncertainty after Terrorist Attacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1