The Rise or Decline of Work in the Welfare State? Equality and Efficiency Revisited

S. Ólafsson
{"title":"The Rise or Decline of Work in the Welfare State? Equality and Efficiency Revisited","authors":"S. Ólafsson","doi":"10.1080/15579336.1991.11770013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two basic positions on the question of how work fares in the modern welfare state: one emphasizing the rise of work and the other predicting its decline. The first sees the mixed-economy welfare state as striving, in the spirit of John Maynard Keynes and William Bever idge, toward the goal of full employment in a free society. The welfare state is assumed to cherish this goal to a greater extent than more market-oriented societies. It is also assumed by many to succeed better in its task of alleviating the problem of unemployment and giving all able and willing citizens opportunities to find suitable employment. The other position warns against negative effects of the welfare state on the economy in general and on work in particular. The welfare state is in this perspective assumed to infiltrate the self-regulating market mechanism and thereby disturb and distort its beneficent functioning. The programs of the welfare state and the means of financing them are also seen as imposing disincentive effects on individuals, eroding their incentive to work.","PeriodicalId":430159,"journal":{"name":"Between Work and Social Citizenship","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between Work and Social Citizenship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1991.11770013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are two basic positions on the question of how work fares in the modern welfare state: one emphasizing the rise of work and the other predicting its decline. The first sees the mixed-economy welfare state as striving, in the spirit of John Maynard Keynes and William Bever idge, toward the goal of full employment in a free society. The welfare state is assumed to cherish this goal to a greater extent than more market-oriented societies. It is also assumed by many to succeed better in its task of alleviating the problem of unemployment and giving all able and willing citizens opportunities to find suitable employment. The other position warns against negative effects of the welfare state on the economy in general and on work in particular. The welfare state is in this perspective assumed to infiltrate the self-regulating market mechanism and thereby disturb and distort its beneficent functioning. The programs of the welfare state and the means of financing them are also seen as imposing disincentive effects on individuals, eroding their incentive to work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利国家工作的上升或下降?重新审视平等和效率
关于工作在现代福利国家中如何发展的问题,有两种基本立场:一种强调工作的增加,另一种预测工作的减少。第一种观点将混合经济福利国家视为秉承约翰•梅纳德•凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes)和威廉•贝弗里奇(William Bever idge)的精神,在自由社会中努力实现充分就业的目标。福利国家被认为比市场导向的社会更珍视这一目标。许多人还认为,它在减轻失业问题和使所有有能力和有意愿的公民有机会找到合适的工作方面的任务能取得更好的成功。另一种立场警告说,福利国家对总体经济,特别是对工作的负面影响。从这个角度来看,福利国家被认为渗透到自我调节的市场机制中,从而干扰和扭曲了其有益的功能。福利国家的计划及其融资手段也被视为对个人施加了抑制作用,侵蚀了他们的工作动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unemployment Regimes Work and Leisure Among the Disemployed: A Conceptual and Empirical Excursion The Rise of Disemployment The Rise or Decline of Work in the Welfare State? Equality and Efficiency Revisited Decommodification and Work Absence in the Welfare State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1