Capitalismo extractivo, imperialismo extractivo e imperialismo: una aclaración

Dennis C. Canterbury
{"title":"Capitalismo extractivo, imperialismo extractivo e imperialismo: una aclaración","authors":"Dennis C. Canterbury","doi":"10.35533/ecd.0815.dcc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the «extractive capitalism», the «extractive imperialism» and the «imperialism» are analyzed in order to clear out the confusion on the debate about neoextractivism caused by the interchangeable usage of these concepts. Urgent attention is required to reinforce the comprehension about the underlying class struggle in the extractive industries. The strating point is the counterpoint developed by Petras and Veltmeyer about the theorical and political issues of the state role in their review concerning the theory of neoextractivism. In order to understand their arguments is necessary to involve the three concepts. Their analysis about the relation between capitalism and imperialism is crucial to understand the extractive capitalism and the extractive imperialism. The argument is that the extractivism is the incarnation of a particular form of productive activity in the capitalist era that deepens the capitalism in the capitalist periphery. The extraction of natural resources is not a purely capitalist process or imperialist; the human beings have extracted their livelihood from the nature since the primitive communalism until the current capitalism. It is not the specific productive activity of extracting natural resources, that is capitalist or imperialist, since the capitalism, and by extension, the imperialism is associated with a variety of productive activities. The productive activity must have a place inside a capital-work salaried nexus in order to belong to a capitalist kind. Some of the first expositions about the definitions of this concepts are reviewed to help the activists to have a clear comprehension about the debate of the neoextractivism.","PeriodicalId":431645,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35533/ecd.0815.dcc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article the «extractive capitalism», the «extractive imperialism» and the «imperialism» are analyzed in order to clear out the confusion on the debate about neoextractivism caused by the interchangeable usage of these concepts. Urgent attention is required to reinforce the comprehension about the underlying class struggle in the extractive industries. The strating point is the counterpoint developed by Petras and Veltmeyer about the theorical and political issues of the state role in their review concerning the theory of neoextractivism. In order to understand their arguments is necessary to involve the three concepts. Their analysis about the relation between capitalism and imperialism is crucial to understand the extractive capitalism and the extractive imperialism. The argument is that the extractivism is the incarnation of a particular form of productive activity in the capitalist era that deepens the capitalism in the capitalist periphery. The extraction of natural resources is not a purely capitalist process or imperialist; the human beings have extracted their livelihood from the nature since the primitive communalism until the current capitalism. It is not the specific productive activity of extracting natural resources, that is capitalist or imperialist, since the capitalism, and by extension, the imperialism is associated with a variety of productive activities. The productive activity must have a place inside a capital-work salaried nexus in order to belong to a capitalist kind. Some of the first expositions about the definitions of this concepts are reviewed to help the activists to have a clear comprehension about the debate of the neoextractivism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
榨取资本主义、榨取帝国主义和帝国主义:澄清
本文对“掠夺性资本主义”、“掠夺性帝国主义”和“帝国主义”进行了分析,以澄清由于这些概念的交替使用而引起的关于新掠夺性的争论的混乱。迫切需要注意加强对采掘业中潜在阶级斗争的理解。战略要点是佩特拉斯和维特迈耶在他们对新榨取主义理论的回顾中提出的关于国家角色的理论和政治问题的对应点。为了理解他们的论点,有必要涉及这三个概念。他们对资本主义与帝国主义关系的分析,对于理解掠夺性资本主义和掠夺性帝国主义是至关重要的。论点是,榨取主义是资本主义时代一种特殊形式的生产活动的化身,它加深了资本主义外围的资本主义。自然资源的开采不是纯粹的资本主义过程或帝国主义过程;从原始的公社主义到现在的资本主义,人类一直从自然中榨取生计。它不是开采自然资源的特定生产活动,这是资本主义或帝国主义的,因为资本主义,延伸开来,帝国主义与各种生产活动有关。生产活动必须在资本-工作-受薪关系中占有一席之地,才能属于资本主义类型。本文回顾了有关这些概念定义的一些初步论述,以帮助活动家对新提取主义的争论有一个清晰的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
América Latina y su extractivismo: desafíos para un desarrollo sustentable e incluyente La forma del agua en el capitalismo especular: privatización, mercantilización y comodificación México: un capitalismo sui generis que desafía a la teoría del desarrollo y a los gobiernos transformistas Pueblos en resistencia: forjando el sujeto revolucionario comunitario Agua, tierra y oro: la urgente situación ambiental ante el extractivismo en Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1