Bemerkungen zu Substanz und Wissen Gottes in Boethius’ Philosophiae consolatio

Andreas Bächli
{"title":"Bemerkungen zu Substanz und Wissen Gottes in Boethius’ Philosophiae consolatio","authors":"Andreas Bächli","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.6.03BAC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boethius’ attempt to clarify the notion of divine providence in the Philosophiae consolatiois based on the conception of divine substance as »eternity«. Concerning his distinction between »providence« and »fate«, this essay reconsiders and modi;es the view of some modern readers, according to which Boethius’s account entirely depends on Proclus. The fact that Boethius associates the notion of the One or the supreme Good with the notion of eternity suggests a rather free use of Proclus’s ideas. Although the solution of the problem of the »necessity« of future contingent events he proposes is not new, what he has to say on divine »comprehension« does not seem to consist merely in a presentation of views of his Neopla­tonic predecessors.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"290 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.6.03BAC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Boethius’ attempt to clarify the notion of divine providence in the Philosophiae consolatiois based on the conception of divine substance as »eternity«. Concerning his distinction between »providence« and »fate«, this essay reconsiders and modi;es the view of some modern readers, according to which Boethius’s account entirely depends on Proclus. The fact that Boethius associates the notion of the One or the supreme Good with the notion of eternity suggests a rather free use of Proclus’s ideas. Although the solution of the problem of the »necessity« of future contingent events he proposes is not new, what he has to say on divine »comprehension« does not seem to consist merely in a presentation of views of his Neopla­tonic predecessors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对上帝的言行和博利修斯哲学知道很多
波伊提乌试图在《慰藉哲学》中以“永恒”的神圣实体概念为基础,澄清神圣天意的概念。关于波伊提乌对“天意”和“命运”的区别,本文重新考虑并修正了一些现代读者的观点,根据这些观点,波伊提乌的叙述完全依赖于普罗克劳斯。波伊提乌将“一”或“至善”的概念与永恒的概念联系在一起,这一事实表明,波伊提乌相当自由地使用了普罗克劳斯的思想。尽管他提出的未来偶然事件的“必然性”问题的解决方案并不新鲜,但他对神圣的“理解”所说的似乎并不仅仅是他的新柏拉图主义前辈的观点的呈现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Chaldäischen Orakel in proklos philosophie Kritik über Leeten (2019): Redepraxis als Lebenspraxis. Die diskursive Kultur der antiken Ethik Kritik über Hengelbrock (2018): Zeit und Freizeit: Seneca, Epistulae morales Proclus armeniacus “Mirum est si intellectus noster omnem scientiam accipiens ex phantasmate”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1