Wearable sensing devices acceptance behavior in construction safety and health: assessing existing models and developing a hybrid conceptual model

Ifeanyi Okpala, C. Nnaji, Ibukun Awolusi
{"title":"Wearable sensing devices acceptance behavior in construction safety and health: assessing existing models and developing a hybrid conceptual model","authors":"Ifeanyi Okpala, C. Nnaji, Ibukun Awolusi","doi":"10.1108/CI-04-2020-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine relationships between several key technology acceptance variables that predict workers’ wearable sensing devices (WSDs) acceptance in the construction industry by using technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. The study proposes a hybrid conceptual model to measure construction field workers’ intentions to use WSDs and their usage behaviors. The study introduces variables that are instrumental in understanding and improving WSD acceptance in construction.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study was carried out using a structured literature review, online survey and structural equation modeling. A total of 195 field workers across the USA, with experience in using WSDs, participated in the study.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicate that all three theories predict WSD acceptance with variables explaining at least 89% of the variance in actual use, with the UTAUT outperforming other models (91%). However, the differences between the predictive power of these models were not statistically significant. A hybrid conceptual model is proposed using findings from the present study.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study contributes to knowledge and practice by highlighting key variables that influence WSD acceptance. Findings from this study should provide stakeholders with critical insights needed to successfully drive WSD acceptance in the construction industry.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the predictive strength of multiple technology acceptance theories and models within the construction worker safety technology domain. Additionally, the study proposes a hybrid conceptual model which could provide practitioners and researchers with information pertinent to enhancing WSD acceptance.\n","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2020-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine relationships between several key technology acceptance variables that predict workers’ wearable sensing devices (WSDs) acceptance in the construction industry by using technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. The study proposes a hybrid conceptual model to measure construction field workers’ intentions to use WSDs and their usage behaviors. The study introduces variables that are instrumental in understanding and improving WSD acceptance in construction. Design/methodology/approach The study was carried out using a structured literature review, online survey and structural equation modeling. A total of 195 field workers across the USA, with experience in using WSDs, participated in the study. Findings Results indicate that all three theories predict WSD acceptance with variables explaining at least 89% of the variance in actual use, with the UTAUT outperforming other models (91%). However, the differences between the predictive power of these models were not statistically significant. A hybrid conceptual model is proposed using findings from the present study. Practical implications The study contributes to knowledge and practice by highlighting key variables that influence WSD acceptance. Findings from this study should provide stakeholders with critical insights needed to successfully drive WSD acceptance in the construction industry. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the predictive strength of multiple technology acceptance theories and models within the construction worker safety technology domain. Additionally, the study proposes a hybrid conceptual model which could provide practitioners and researchers with information pertinent to enhancing WSD acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑安全与健康中的可穿戴传感设备接受行为:评估现有模型并开发混合概念模型
本研究旨在运用技术接受模型、计划行为理论和技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)模型,研究预测建筑行业工人可穿戴传感设备(WSDs)接受程度的几个关键技术接受变量之间的关系。本研究提出一个混合概念模型来衡量建筑工地工人使用wsd的意愿和使用行为。该研究引入了一些变量,这些变量有助于理解和提高建筑工程对水务署的接受程度。设计/方法/方法本研究采用结构化文献综述、在线调查和结构方程模型进行。美国共有195名具有使用wsd经验的现场工作人员参与了这项研究。研究结果表明,所有三种理论预测水处理接受程度的变量在实际使用中解释了至少89%的方差,其中UTAUT优于其他模型(91%)。然而,这些模型的预测能力之间的差异没有统计学意义。根据本研究的结果,提出了一个混合概念模型。实际意义这项研究突出了影响水务署认可度的主要因素,有助于认识和实践。这项研究的结果将为持份者提供重要的见解,以成功推动水务署在建造业的认可。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个评估建筑工人安全技术领域多种技术接受理论和模型的预测强度的研究。此外,研究亦提出一个混合概念模型,为从业员和研究人员提供有关提高水务署认可度的资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1