Home

R. Colls
{"title":"Home","authors":"R. Colls","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198208334.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 sees the parish as a platform for belonging, and sport and custom as celebrations of that belonging. It opens with Edwin Butterworth, a well-connected journalist working for Edward Baines, the radical newspaper owner, who was writing a history of Lancashire. Charged in 1835 with surveying a county deep in the throes of industrialization, and keen to establish the state of ‘Customs, Habits, &c’, Butterworth’s findings do not show the sudden death of parochial custom any more than they show the rising up of a great new factory system. Instead, they show parochial culture dying in some places but flourishing (and changing) in others. The chapter goes on to look more widely at how this old parochial culture had bound people to their sense of place—what the old Poor Law called ‘settlement’. At the same time the chapter notes how from the 1830s to the 1880s, the welfare functions that had underpinned settlement were being removed and given to quasi-national bodies. Apart from Church of England clergy who were not quite insiders or outsiders, the parish had insiders who were enemies as well. Primitive Methodists were anti-sport and counter-parochial for all of the nineteenth century. They brought disruption with a new kind of belonging.","PeriodicalId":159082,"journal":{"name":"This Sporting Life","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"This Sporting Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198208334.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 5 sees the parish as a platform for belonging, and sport and custom as celebrations of that belonging. It opens with Edwin Butterworth, a well-connected journalist working for Edward Baines, the radical newspaper owner, who was writing a history of Lancashire. Charged in 1835 with surveying a county deep in the throes of industrialization, and keen to establish the state of ‘Customs, Habits, &c’, Butterworth’s findings do not show the sudden death of parochial custom any more than they show the rising up of a great new factory system. Instead, they show parochial culture dying in some places but flourishing (and changing) in others. The chapter goes on to look more widely at how this old parochial culture had bound people to their sense of place—what the old Poor Law called ‘settlement’. At the same time the chapter notes how from the 1830s to the 1880s, the welfare functions that had underpinned settlement were being removed and given to quasi-national bodies. Apart from Church of England clergy who were not quite insiders or outsiders, the parish had insiders who were enemies as well. Primitive Methodists were anti-sport and counter-parochial for all of the nineteenth century. They brought disruption with a new kind of belonging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首页
第五章将教区视为归属感的平台,而体育和习俗则是对归属感的庆祝。故事以埃德温·巴特沃斯(Edwin Butterworth)开篇,他是一位人脉广泛的记者,为激进的报纸老板爱德华·贝恩斯(Edward Baines)工作,后者正在撰写兰开夏郡的历史。1835年,巴特沃斯被委托对一个深陷工业化阵痛的郡进行调查,并渴望建立一个“风俗习惯等”的国家。他的调查结果既没有显示出一个伟大的新工厂制度的兴起,也没有显示出地方习俗的突然消亡。相反,它们显示出教区文化在一些地方正在消亡,但在另一些地方却在蓬勃发展(并不断变化)。这一章将更广泛地探讨这种古老的教区文化是如何将人们束缚在他们的地方意识上的——旧《济贫法》称之为“定居”。与此同时,本章还指出,从19世纪30年代到80年代,作为定居基础的福利职能如何被移除,并被赋予准国家机构。除了英格兰国教的神职人员既不是内部人员也不是外部人员,教区内部人员也是敌人。原始卫理公会教徒在整个十九世纪都是反对运动和反对教区化的。他们带来了一种新的归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Bottom’ Conclusion Bloods Bonny Moor Hen Moderns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1