{"title":"Perbedaan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Antara Penggunaan Metode Talking Stick Dan Pair Check Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa","authors":"Pradipta Annurwanda, Rizki Nurhana Friantini","doi":"10.21137/edumatic.v2i01.462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract— This study aims to determine the differences in understanding the concepts ofmathematics subjects from each learning method, learning style and the interaction of both.This research is a quantitative research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population in thisstudy were all eighth grade students of Maniamas Ngabang Middle School 2019/2020academic year totaling 105 people. Samples were taken by cluster random samplingtechnique with a total sample of 78 people. The instrument used was a test instrument tomeasure understanding of mathematical concepts and questionnaire instruments to measurestudent learning styles. The data analysis technique uses two-way variance (two way ANOVA)with a significant level of 5%. Based on the results of the calculation of the hypothesis testcan be concluded (1) There are differences in understanding the concept of mathematicssubjects between the use of the Talking Stick method, Pair Check and conventional materialrelations and functions, namely (a) Students taught by the Talking Stick and Pair Checkmethod produce understanding mathematical concepts the same is good, (b) Students taughtwith the Talking Stick method are better than students taught with conventional methods and(c) Students taught by the Pair Check method are better than students taught by conventionalmethods. (2) There is no difference in understanding of the concepts of mathematical subjectsbetween students who have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and (3) There is nointeraction of understanding mathematical concepts between each learning method andlearning style.","PeriodicalId":424017,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Edumatic : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Edumatic : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21137/edumatic.v2i01.462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract— This study aims to determine the differences in understanding the concepts ofmathematics subjects from each learning method, learning style and the interaction of both.This research is a quantitative research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population in thisstudy were all eighth grade students of Maniamas Ngabang Middle School 2019/2020academic year totaling 105 people. Samples were taken by cluster random samplingtechnique with a total sample of 78 people. The instrument used was a test instrument tomeasure understanding of mathematical concepts and questionnaire instruments to measurestudent learning styles. The data analysis technique uses two-way variance (two way ANOVA)with a significant level of 5%. Based on the results of the calculation of the hypothesis testcan be concluded (1) There are differences in understanding the concept of mathematicssubjects between the use of the Talking Stick method, Pair Check and conventional materialrelations and functions, namely (a) Students taught by the Talking Stick and Pair Checkmethod produce understanding mathematical concepts the same is good, (b) Students taughtwith the Talking Stick method are better than students taught with conventional methods and(c) Students taught by the Pair Check method are better than students taught by conventionalmethods. (2) There is no difference in understanding of the concepts of mathematical subjectsbetween students who have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and (3) There is nointeraction of understanding mathematical concepts between each learning method andlearning style.
摘要:本研究旨在从不同的学习方法、学习风格以及两者之间的相互作用来确定学生对数学学科概念的理解差异。本研究采用3x3因子设计进行定量研究。本研究的人群均为2019/2020学年马娜玛斯阿邦中学八年级学生,共105人。样本采用整群随机抽样法,共78人。所使用的工具是测量数学概念理解的测试工具和测量学生学习风格的问卷工具。数据分析技术采用双向方差(two way ANOVA),显著水平为5%。根据假设检验的计算结果可以得出以下结论:(1)使用“说话棒法”、“配对检查法”和传统的物质关系和函数法对数学学科概念的理解存在差异,即(a)使用“说话棒法”和“配对检查法”所教的学生产生的对数学概念的理解相同是好的;(b)用说话棒法教的学生比用传统方法教的学生好;(c)用结对检查法教的学生比用传统方法教的学生好。(2)具有视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的学生对数学学科概念的理解没有差异;(3)每种学习方法和学习风格之间对数学概念的理解没有相互作用。