Resolving The Sustainable Finance Conundrum: Activist Policies And Financial Technology

E. Avgouleas
{"title":"Resolving The Sustainable Finance Conundrum: Activist Policies And Financial Technology","authors":"E. Avgouleas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3772959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and its devastating impact on public health and social and economic systems has induced citizens, central banks, and governments to rethink sustainable finance. Still, climate change is not the only challenge human societies face today. Racial, gender, and income inequality and the fate of liberal democracy are as important and should feature prominently in public debate and policy-makers’ agendas. Achieving these policy objectives as encapsulated in the United Nations (UN) Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), requires substantial investment. The growing field of sustainable finance has sought to provide that funding, but the current funding gap remains enormous. The funding gap is the product of three formidable obstacles: (a) legal restrictions, (b) lack of a reliable mechanism for the monitoring and verification of the actual sustainability impact of green investments and policies, and (c) finance models that narrowly measure investment risk and return. These obstacles act like a dam with regards to sustainable finance flows and the dam may only be breached if public policy takes a stronger role in actively encouraging sustainable investment through tax and regulatory incentives. To implement that policy an accord among G-20 countries, from which most private investment flows originate, is required. A tax that would treat capital flows that do not have a direct or indirect sustainability impact, for example, investments in the carbon fuel industry, as a negative externality would constitute a radical departure from the more benign policies tried so far such as reporting/disclosure and pricing of carbon emissions. To be effective it would require international consensus. While calls for a similar levy were also raised in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis and went nowhere, the result of the recent US election in combination with the devastating impact of the pandemic may prove the watershed moment. Moreover, cutting-edge financial technology encompassing artificial intelligence, machine learning and blockchain technology can be critical in terms of boosting sustainable finance and creating a scientifically accurate environment for the allocation of the proposed here green taxes and subsidies among investment portfolios. With the advent of autonomous finance gathering momentum there has never been a better time for such a shift in the mechanics of investing.","PeriodicalId":120253,"journal":{"name":"GeographyRN: Economic Geography (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeographyRN: Economic Geography (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3772959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and its devastating impact on public health and social and economic systems has induced citizens, central banks, and governments to rethink sustainable finance. Still, climate change is not the only challenge human societies face today. Racial, gender, and income inequality and the fate of liberal democracy are as important and should feature prominently in public debate and policy-makers’ agendas. Achieving these policy objectives as encapsulated in the United Nations (UN) Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), requires substantial investment. The growing field of sustainable finance has sought to provide that funding, but the current funding gap remains enormous. The funding gap is the product of three formidable obstacles: (a) legal restrictions, (b) lack of a reliable mechanism for the monitoring and verification of the actual sustainability impact of green investments and policies, and (c) finance models that narrowly measure investment risk and return. These obstacles act like a dam with regards to sustainable finance flows and the dam may only be breached if public policy takes a stronger role in actively encouraging sustainable investment through tax and regulatory incentives. To implement that policy an accord among G-20 countries, from which most private investment flows originate, is required. A tax that would treat capital flows that do not have a direct or indirect sustainability impact, for example, investments in the carbon fuel industry, as a negative externality would constitute a radical departure from the more benign policies tried so far such as reporting/disclosure and pricing of carbon emissions. To be effective it would require international consensus. While calls for a similar levy were also raised in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis and went nowhere, the result of the recent US election in combination with the devastating impact of the pandemic may prove the watershed moment. Moreover, cutting-edge financial technology encompassing artificial intelligence, machine learning and blockchain technology can be critical in terms of boosting sustainable finance and creating a scientifically accurate environment for the allocation of the proposed here green taxes and subsidies among investment portfolios. With the advent of autonomous finance gathering momentum there has never been a better time for such a shift in the mechanics of investing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决可持续金融难题:积极政策和金融技术
2019冠状病毒病大流行的爆发及其对公共卫生和社会经济系统的破坏性影响促使公民、中央银行和政府重新思考可持续金融。然而,气候变化并不是当今人类社会面临的唯一挑战。种族、性别和收入不平等以及自由民主的命运同样重要,应该在公共辩论和政策制定者的议程中占据突出地位。要实现联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)中的这些政策目标,需要大量投资。不断发展的可持续金融领域试图提供这种资金,但目前的资金缺口仍然巨大。资金缺口是三个巨大障碍的产物:(a)法律限制;(b)缺乏可靠的机制来监测和验证绿色投资和政策的实际可持续性影响;(c)狭隘地衡量投资风险和回报的融资模式。这些障碍在可持续资金流动方面就像一座大坝,只有公共政策通过税收和监管激励措施在积极鼓励可持续投资方面发挥更大作用,这座大坝才有可能被冲破。要实施这一政策,需要在20国集团(g20)成员国之间达成一项协议,因为大多数私人投资都来自20国集团。如果将对可持续性没有直接或间接影响的资本流动(例如,对碳燃料行业的投资)视为负外部性,将彻底背离迄今为止尝试过的较为温和的政策,如报告/披露和碳排放定价。要想有效,就需要国际共识。尽管在全球金融危机之后也有人呼吁征收类似的税,但没有取得任何进展,但最近美国大选的结果,加上疫情的破坏性影响,可能成为一个分水岭。此外,包括人工智能,机器学习和区块链技术在内的尖端金融技术对于促进可持续金融以及为在投资组合中分配拟议的绿色税收和补贴创造科学准确的环境至关重要。随着自主金融的出现势头日益增强,现在是投资机制发生这种转变的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Private Versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration and Cost Impacts Resolving The Sustainable Finance Conundrum: Activist Policies And Financial Technology Niger - Land, Climate, Energy, Agriculture and Development: A Study in the Sudano-Sahel Initiative for Regional Development, Jobs, and Food Security Where is Pollution Moving? Environmental Markets and Environmental Justice The Effect Consumers' Consciousness, Social and Personality Factors on Purchase Intention for Organic Cosmetic in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1