Robust Design of Aero Engine Structures: Using the Weighted Product Method

Sangeetha Rajkumar, Vimala Saravanan, M. Ramachandran, M. Selvam
{"title":"Robust Design of Aero Engine Structures: Using the Weighted Product Method","authors":"Sangeetha Rajkumar, Vimala Saravanan, M. Ramachandran, M. Selvam","doi":"10.46632/aae/1/1/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total loss of quality in products or processes Reduction is the objective of robust design. Strong Design is an effective approach that aims to simultaneously decrease product costs and enhance quality while also significantly reducing development time. Strength is defined as a skill Raw material, operating conditions, process equipment, environmental conditions, and human Expected variation in factors Tolerant manufacturing process. Robust design is the design of products, devices, and manufacturing equipment so that their performance and functionality are insensitive to multiple variations, such as manufacturing and assembly tolerances, ambient use conditions, or degradation over time. Therefore, there is not strong design sensitivity – meaning that variation in the product will have minimal influence. In essence, robust design means minimizing the impact of variation on a product. One or more due to unforeseen circumstances Input variables or assumptions are rigorous although modified, their output and predictions are accurate A model is considered robust if. The alternatives being considered are related to specific aircraft features: the aerodynamic characteristic (C1), maximum takeoff weight (C2), armament (C3), and avionics (C4). The evaluation options are Ao, F-16, Su-35, and Mig-35. Based on the evaluation results, Ao obtained the top rank, while Mig-35 received the lowest rank.The value of the dataset for Robust Design of Aero Engine in Weighted product method shows that it results in Ao and top ranking","PeriodicalId":294140,"journal":{"name":"Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/aae/1/1/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total loss of quality in products or processes Reduction is the objective of robust design. Strong Design is an effective approach that aims to simultaneously decrease product costs and enhance quality while also significantly reducing development time. Strength is defined as a skill Raw material, operating conditions, process equipment, environmental conditions, and human Expected variation in factors Tolerant manufacturing process. Robust design is the design of products, devices, and manufacturing equipment so that their performance and functionality are insensitive to multiple variations, such as manufacturing and assembly tolerances, ambient use conditions, or degradation over time. Therefore, there is not strong design sensitivity – meaning that variation in the product will have minimal influence. In essence, robust design means minimizing the impact of variation on a product. One or more due to unforeseen circumstances Input variables or assumptions are rigorous although modified, their output and predictions are accurate A model is considered robust if. The alternatives being considered are related to specific aircraft features: the aerodynamic characteristic (C1), maximum takeoff weight (C2), armament (C3), and avionics (C4). The evaluation options are Ao, F-16, Su-35, and Mig-35. Based on the evaluation results, Ao obtained the top rank, while Mig-35 received the lowest rank.The value of the dataset for Robust Design of Aero Engine in Weighted product method shows that it results in Ao and top ranking
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空发动机结构稳健性设计:基于加权积法
减少产品或工艺的总质量损失是稳健设计的目标。强设计是一种有效的方法,旨在同时降低产品成本和提高质量,同时显著缩短开发时间。强度被定义为一种技能,是对原材料、操作条件、工艺设备、环境条件和人的预期变化等因素的容忍制造过程。稳健设计是对产品、设备和制造设备的设计,使其性能和功能对多种变化不敏感,例如制造和装配公差、环境使用条件或随时间的退化。因此,没有很强的设计敏感性-这意味着产品的变化将有最小的影响。从本质上讲,稳健设计意味着将变化对产品的影响最小化。一个或多个由于不可预见的情况输入变量或假设是严格的,虽然修改,他们的输出和预测是准确的一个模型被认为是健壮的,如果。正在考虑的备选方案与具体的飞机特性有关:空气动力学特性(C1),最大起飞重量(C2),武器(C3)和航空电子设备(C4)。评估选项是Ao, F-16,苏-35和米格-35。根据评估结果,奥获得了最高等级,而米格-35获得了最低等级。对航空发动机鲁棒性设计数据集的加权积分析结果表明,该方法的结果为Ao和top
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Ultraviolet Radiation using the MOORA Method Environmental Impact Assessment United States of India Using GRA Method More Electric Planes Analyses of the Difficulties and Possibilities for Business Transport Aircraft Using WSM Method Assessment of Selecting the Most Appropriate Oilseed for Biodiesel Production Using the COPRAS Method Assessment on Selection of Appropriate Materials for Fuselage of an Aircraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1