Assessment on Selection of Appropriate Materials for Fuselage of an Aircraft

Kurinjimalar Ramu, M Ramachandran, Vimala Saravanan, Sathiyaraj Chinnasamy
{"title":"Assessment on Selection of Appropriate Materials for Fuselage of an Aircraft","authors":"Kurinjimalar Ramu, M Ramachandran, Vimala Saravanan, Sathiyaraj Chinnasamy","doi":"10.46632/aae/1/1/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering composites, after treatments like heat processing, and the creation of composite substances in addition to pure components, the range of engineering components is steadily expanding. It is crucial to choose the best material from such a huge material source for each unique part that needs to be made. The picking of acceptable composition for the fuselage, A critical aircraft component, its importance lies in its lightweight and cost-effective nature, along with its thermal and mechanical characteristics. The criteria and options in this study, which attempts to choose components for the fuselage of a commercial airplane, have first been established following expert viewpoints. During the research, the COPRAS technique was employed to evaluate various materials, considering factors such as \"density, tensile strength, shear strength, and cost.\" According to the ranking of options using the COPRAS approach, CFRP is the best option, followed by GFRP, AISI 4130, Al 2024-T3, Al 5052-H32, Al 6061-T6, Al 7075-T6, and AZ31B. In comparison to other chosen materials, CFRP recorded the highest importance with the tensile strength of 1240 MPa, shear strength of 740 MPa, and elastic modulus of 145 Gpa, whereas AZ318 recorded the lowest relevance with the tensile strength of 290 MPa, shear strength of 130 MPa, and elastic modulus of 45 Gpa. The order is summarized as \" CFRP> GFRP>AISI 4130> Al 7075-T6> Al 2024-T3> Al 6061-T6> Al 5052-H32> AZ31B \".As per the result of the COPRAS approach, the three choices that were most suited for the fuselage were \"CFRP, GFRP, and AISI 4130\", with \"AZ318 being the least appropriate.","PeriodicalId":294140,"journal":{"name":"Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/aae/1/1/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering composites, after treatments like heat processing, and the creation of composite substances in addition to pure components, the range of engineering components is steadily expanding. It is crucial to choose the best material from such a huge material source for each unique part that needs to be made. The picking of acceptable composition for the fuselage, A critical aircraft component, its importance lies in its lightweight and cost-effective nature, along with its thermal and mechanical characteristics. The criteria and options in this study, which attempts to choose components for the fuselage of a commercial airplane, have first been established following expert viewpoints. During the research, the COPRAS technique was employed to evaluate various materials, considering factors such as "density, tensile strength, shear strength, and cost." According to the ranking of options using the COPRAS approach, CFRP is the best option, followed by GFRP, AISI 4130, Al 2024-T3, Al 5052-H32, Al 6061-T6, Al 7075-T6, and AZ31B. In comparison to other chosen materials, CFRP recorded the highest importance with the tensile strength of 1240 MPa, shear strength of 740 MPa, and elastic modulus of 145 Gpa, whereas AZ318 recorded the lowest relevance with the tensile strength of 290 MPa, shear strength of 130 MPa, and elastic modulus of 45 Gpa. The order is summarized as " CFRP> GFRP>AISI 4130> Al 7075-T6> Al 2024-T3> Al 6061-T6> Al 5052-H32> AZ31B ".As per the result of the COPRAS approach, the three choices that were most suited for the fuselage were "CFRP, GFRP, and AISI 4130", with "AZ318 being the least appropriate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞机机身材料选择的评估
考虑到复合材料,经过热处理等处理,除了纯组件之外,还创造了复合物质,工程组件的范围正在稳步扩大。对于需要制造的每个独特部件,从如此庞大的材料来源中选择最佳材料至关重要。机身是飞机的关键部件,它的重要性在于它的重量轻,成本效益高,以及它的热学和机械特性。本研究试图选择商用飞机机身部件的标准和选项,首先根据专家的观点建立。在研究过程中,采用COPRAS技术评估各种材料,考虑诸如“密度、抗拉强度、抗剪强度和成本”等因素。根据COPRAS方法的方案排序,CFRP为最佳方案,其次为GFRP、AISI 4130、Al 2024-T3、Al 5052-H32、Al 6061-T6、Al 7075-T6、AZ31B。与其他材料相比,CFRP的抗拉强度为1240 MPa,抗剪强度为740 MPa,弹性模量为145 Gpa,而AZ318的抗拉强度为290 MPa,抗剪强度为130 MPa,弹性模量为45 Gpa,相关性最低。订单总结为“CFRP> GFRP>AISI 4130> Al 7075-T6> Al 2024-T3> Al 6061-T6> Al 5052-H32> AZ31B”。根据COPRAS方法的结果,最适合机身的三种选择是“CFRP, GFRP和AISI 4130”,“AZ318”是最不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Ultraviolet Radiation using the MOORA Method Environmental Impact Assessment United States of India Using GRA Method More Electric Planes Analyses of the Difficulties and Possibilities for Business Transport Aircraft Using WSM Method Assessment of Selecting the Most Appropriate Oilseed for Biodiesel Production Using the COPRAS Method Assessment on Selection of Appropriate Materials for Fuselage of an Aircraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1